Literatur

Sie wollen tiefer einsteigen? Aktuelle Literaturempfehlungen zum Thema Forschungsdatenmanagement.

Rechtliche Fragestellungen

  1. Meyermann, A., & Porzelt, M. (2014). Hinweise zur Anonymisierung von qualitativen Daten. Forschungsdaten Bildung Informiert, (1). Retrieved from https://www.forschungsdaten-bildung.de/get_files.php?action=get_file&file=fdb-informiert-nr-1.pdf
  2. Ebel, T., & Meyermann, A. (2015). Hinweise zur Anonymisierung von quantitativen Daten. Forschungsdaten Bildung Informiert, (3). Retrieved from https://www.forschungsdaten-bildung.de/get_files.php?action=get_file&file=fdb-informiert-nr-3.pdf
  3. Volkmann, S., Feiten, L., Zimmermann, C., Sester, S., Wehle, L., & Becker, B. (2016). Digitale Tarnkappe: Anonymisierung in Videoaufnahmen. In H. C. Mayr & M. Pinzger (Eds.), GI-Jahrestagung: Vol. P-259 (pp. 413–426; By H. C. Mayr & M. Pinzger). Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/gi/gi2016.html#VolkmannFZSWB16
  4. Klimpel, P. (2018). Mehr als Materialbewahrung Über die Bedeutung von Rechteinformationen und Lizenzierung in Bibliotheken. Lizenzangaben Und Rechtedokumentationen Im Dialog – Datenflüsse Nachhaltig Gestalten. Presented at the Frankfurt am Main.
  5. Nationalbibliothek, D. (Ed.). (2018). Lizenzangaben und Rechtedokumentationen im Dialog - Datenflüsse nachhaltig gestalten (By D. Nationalbibliothek).
  6. Hannover, L. U., & Informationsbibliothek, T. (2018). FAQs Zu Rechtlichen Aspekten Im Umgang Mit Forschungsdaten. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1173546
  7. Lauber‐Rönsberg, A., Krahn, P., & Baumann, P. (2018). Gutachten zu den rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen des Forschungsdatenmanagements. Retrieved from https://tu-dresden.de/gsw/jura/igewem/jfbimd13/ressourcen/dateien/publikationen/DataJus_Zusammenfassung_Gutachten_12-07-18.pdf?lang=de
  8. Stietenroth, D., Nieschulze, J., & Arend, K. (2005). Rechtliche Aspekte und Umsetzung des Datenmanagement in internationalen interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekten. Zeitschrift Für Agrarinformatik, 3, 64–75. Retrieved from http://www.gil.de/publications/zai/archiv/11_3_2005.pdf
  9. Guibault, L., & Wiebe, A. (2013). Safe to be open. Study on the protection of research data and recommendations für access and usage. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Forschungssoftware

  1. Erdmann, C., Simons, N., Otsuji, R., Labou, S., Johnson, R., Castelao, G., … Dennis, T. (2019). Top 10 FAIR Data & Software Things. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2555498
  2. Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018a). Software Deposit and Preservation Policy and                    Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310
  3. Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018b). Software Deposit And Preservation Policy And Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310
  4. Gundersen, O. E., & Kjensmo, S. (2018). State of the Art: Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence. In S. McIlraith & K. Weinberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18) (By S. McIlraith & K. Weinberger). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
  5. Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018a). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age (pp. 284–291; By G. Rehm & T. Declerck). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  6. Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018b). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age (pp. 284–291; By G. Rehm & T. Declerck). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  7. Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018c). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age: 27th International Conference, GSCL 2017, Berlin, Germany, September 13-14, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 284--291; By G. Rehm & T. Declerck). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_24
  8. Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018d). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age: 27th International Conference, GSCL 2017, Berlin, Germany, September 13-14, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 284--291; By G. Rehm & T. Declerck). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_24
  9. Hermann, S., Hahn, U., Gärtner, M., & Fritze, F. (2018). Nachträglich ist nicht gleich nachnutzbar: Ansätze für integrierte Prozessdokumentation im Forschungsalltag: 32-45 Seiten / o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal / herausgegeben vom VDB, Bd. 5 Nr. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5282/O-BIB/2018H3S32-45
  10. Katerbow, M., & Feulner, G. (2018a). Handreichung Zum Umgang Mit Forschungssoftware. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1172970
  11. Katerbow, M., & Feulner, G. (2018b). Handreichung Zum Umgang Mit Forschungssoftware. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1172970
  12. no author. (15.02.2018). Choose an open source license | Choose a License. Retrieved from https://choosealicense.com/
  13. Atkinson, M., Gesing, S., Montagnat, J., & Taylor, I. (2017). Scientific workflows: Past, present and future. Future Generation Computer Systems, 75, 216–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.05.041
  14. da Silva, R. F., Filgueira, R., Pietri, I., Jiang, M., Sakellariou, R., & Deelman, E. (2017). A characterization of workflow management systems for extreme-scale applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 75, 228–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.02.026
  15. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017a). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten Managen. Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/22886/
  16. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017b). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten Managen. Presented at the E-Science-Tage 2017, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00022886
  17. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017c). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten Managen. Presented at the E-Science-Tage 2017, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00022886
  18. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017d). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten Managen. Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/22886/
  19. Hong, N. C. (2017, May). Software sustainability - guidelines for the selfish scientist. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4962950.v1
  20. Jones, M. B., Boettiger, C., Mayes, A. C., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., … Goble, C. (2017). CodeMeta: an exchange schema for software metadata. Version 2.0. https://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0
  21. Knoth, C., & Nüst, D. (2017). Reproducibility and Practical Adoption of GEOBIA with Open-Source Software in Docker Containers. Remote Sensing, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030290
  22. Levin, N., & Leonelli, S. (2017). How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(2), 280–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916672071
  23. Nuest, D., Konkol, M., Schutzeichel, M., Pebesma, E., Kray, C., Przibytzin, H., & Lorenz, J. (2017). Opening the Publication Process with Executable Research Compendia. D-Lib Magazine, 23(1/2). https://doi.org/10.1045/january2017-nuest
  24. Scheliga, K. S., Pampel, H., Bernstein, E., Bruch, C., zu Castell, W., Diesmann, M., … Steglich, D. (2017). Helmholtz Open Science Workshop „Zugang zu und Nachnutzung von wissenschaftlicher Software“ #hgfos16 : Report ; November 2016. https://doi.org/10.2312/lis.17.01
  25. Software Source Code IG (Ed.). (2017a). Software Source Code IG. Retrieved from https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/software-source-code-ig
  26. Software Source Code IG (Ed.). (2017b). Software Source Code IG. Retrieved from https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/software-source-code-ig
  27. Artaza, H., Chue Hong, N., Corpas, M., Corpuz, A., Hooft, R., Jimenez, R., … Vaughan, D. (2016). Top 10 metrics for life science software good practices version 1; referees: 2 approved. F1000Research, 5(2000). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9206.1
  28. Borgman, C. L., Golshan, M. S., Sands, A. E., Wallis, J. C., Cummings, R. L., Darch, P. T., & Randles, B. M. (2016). Data Management in the Long Tail: Science, Software, and Service. IJDC, 11(1), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.428
  29. Burgess, L. C., Crotty, D., de Roure, D., Gibbons, J., Goble, C., Missier, P., … O’Beirne, R. (2016). ALAN TURING INSTITUTE SYMPOSIUM ON REPRODUCIBILITY FOR DATA-INTENSIVE RESEARCH--FINAL REPORT.
  30. Druskat, S. (2016). A Proposal for the Measurement and Documentation of Research Software Sustainability in Interactive Metadata Repositories. CoRR. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04529
  31. Fehr, J., and Jan Heiland, Himpe, C., & Saak, J. (2016). Best practices for replicability, reproducibility and reusability of computer-based experiments exemplified by model reduction software. AIMS Mathematics, 1(3), 261--281. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2016.3.261
  32. Hettrick, S. (2016). Research Software Sustainability: Report on a Knowledge Exchange Workshop. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6332/1/Research_Software_Sustainability_Report_on_KE_Workshop_Feb_2016_FINAL.pdf
  33. Howison, J., & Bullard, J. (2016). Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2137--2155. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23538
  34. Katz, D. S., Niemeyer, K. E., Smith, A. M., Anderson, W. L., Boettiger, C., Hinsen, K., … Rios, F. (2016). Software vs. data in the context of citation. PeerJ Preprints, 4, e2630v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2630v1
  35. Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N., & Kozinsky, B. (2016). AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Computational Materials Science, 111, 218–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013
  36. Smith, A. M., Katz, D. S., & Niemeyer, K. E. (2016). Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86
  37. Stodden, V., McNutt, M., Bailey, D. H., Deelman, E., Gil, Y., Hanson, B., … Taufer, M. (2016). Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science, 354(6317), 1240–1241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6168
  38. Stodden, Victoria, McNutt, M., Bailey, D. H., Deelman, E., Gil, Y., Hanson, B., … Taufer, M. (2016). Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science, 354(6317), 1240–1241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6168
  39. Van den Eynden, V., Knight, G., Vlad, A., Radler, B., Tenopir, C., Leon, D., … Corti, L. (2016). Survey of Wellcome researchers and their attitudes to open research (By figshare; figshare, Ed.). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4055448.v1
  40. Wilson, G., Bryan, J., Cranston, K., Kitzes, J., Nederbragt, L., & Teal, T. K. (2016). Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computing. CoRR, abs/1609.00037. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.00037
  41. Ahalt, S., Carsey, T., Couch, A., Hooper, R., Ibanez, L., Idaszak, R., … Robinson, E. (2015). NSF Workshop on Supporting Scientific Discovery Through Norms and Practices for Software and Data Citation and Attribution. USA: National Science Foundation.
  42. Allen, A., Berriman, G. B., DuPrie, K., Mink, J., Nemiroff, R., Robitaille, T., … Wallin, J. (2015). Improving Software Citation and Credit. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07919
  43. Boettiger, C. (2015). An Introduction to Docker for Reproducible Research. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 49(1), 71--79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723872.2723882
  44. McPhillips, T., Song, T., Kolisnik, T., Aulenbach, S., Belhajjame, K., Bocinsky, K., … Ludaescher, B. (2015). YesWorkflow: A User-Oriented, Language-Independent Tool for Recovering  Workflow Information from Scripts. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.02403
  45. Corpas, M., Jimenez, R., Carbon, S. J., García, A., Garcia, L., Goldberg, T., … Hermjakobb, H. (2014). BioJS: an open source standard for biological visualisation – its status in 2014. F1000Research, 3(55). https://doi.org/0.12688/f1000research.3-55.v1
  46. Goodman, A., Pepe, A., Blocker, A. W., Borgman, C. L., Cranmer, K., Crosas, M., … Slavkovic, A. (2014). 10 Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542
  47. Umweltbundesamt (Ed.). (2014). Dokumentation des Fachgesprächs „Nachhaltige Software“ am 28.11.2014. Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/dokumentation_fachgespraech_nachhaltige_software.pdf
  48. Castagné, M. (2013). Institutional repository software comparison: DSpace, EPrints, Digital Commons, Islandora and HydraR (p. 14288 / 1. 0075768). p. 14288 / 1. 0075768. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/graduateresearch/42591/items/1.0075768
  49. Fomel, S., Sava, P., Vlad, I., Liu, Y., & Bashkardin, V. (2013). Madagascar: open-source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments. Journal of Open Research Software, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.ag
  50. Joppa, L. N., McInerny, G., Harper, R., Salido, L., Takeda, K., O’Hara, K., … Emmott, S. (2013). Troubling Trends in Scientific Software Use. Science, 340(6134), 814--815. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231535
  51. Pradal, C., Varoquaux, G., & Langtangen, H. P. (2013). Publishing scientific software matters. J. Comput. Science, 4(5), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2013.08.001
  52. Ram, K. (2013). Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science. Source Code for Biology and Medicine, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-8-7
  53. Sandve, G. K., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., & Hovig, E. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research. PLOS Computational Biology, 9(10), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285
  54. Winn, J. (2013). Research Data Management using CKAN: A Datastore, Data Repository and Data Catalogue. IASSIST Conference. Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iassist/iassist2013.html#Winn13
  55. Pebesma, E., Nüst, D., & Bivand, R. (2012). The R software environment in reproducible geoscientific research. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 93(16), 163--163. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012EO160003
  56. Spatzier, T., Binz, T., Leyman, F., & Breiter, G. (2012). Portable Cloud Services Using TOSCA. IEEE Internet Computing, 16, 80–85. https://doi.org/doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIC.2012.43
  57. Hanson, B., Sugden, A., & Alberts, B. (2011). Making Data Maximally Available. Science, 331(6018), 649. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203354
  58. Stodden, Victoria. (2010). The Scientific Method in Practice: Reproducibility in the Computational Sciences (No. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4773-10; By M. S. R. P. N. 4773-10; M. S. R. P. N. 4773-10, Ed.). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550193
  59. Deelman, E., Gannon, D., Shields, M., & Taylor, I. (2009). Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(5), 528–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.06.012
  60. Roure, D. D., Goble, C., & Stevens, R. (2009). The design and realisation of the Experimentmy Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(5), 561–567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.06.010
  61. McCullough, B. D., McGeary, K. A., & Harrison, T. D. (2008). Do Economics Journal Archives Promote Replicable Research? The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 41(4), 1406–1420. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25478330
  62. Wheeler, D. A. (2007). The Free-Libre / Open Source Software (FLOSS) License Slide.
  63. McGeary, K. A., McCullough, B. D., & Harrison, T. (2006). Lessons from the JMCB archive. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 38(4), 1093–1107. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0061

Befragungen

  1. A. Lebioda, J. F. Lachenmaier, D. Burkhardt. (2019). Control of Cyber-Physical Production Systems: A Concept to Increase the Trustworthiness within Multi-Agent Systems with Distributed Ledger Technology.
  2. Alavi, G., Özbek, S., Rasteh, M., Grözing, M., Berroth, M., Hesselbarth, J., & Burghartz, J. (2019). Towards a Flexible and Adaptive Wireless Hub by Embedding Power Amplifier Thinned Silicon Chip and Antenna in a Polymer Foil. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1759078719000539
  3. Anisimov, P. S. (2019). Triplons in the excitonic Kitaev-Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice : condensation, interactions and topology (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10366
  4. Baz, J., Held, C., Pleiss, J., & Hansen, N. (2019). Thermophysical properties of glyceline-water mixtures investigated by molecular modelling. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 21, 6467–6476.
  5. Blessing, A., Blokker, N., Haunss, S., Kuhn, J., Lapesa, G., & Padó, S. (2019). An Environment for the Relational Annotation of Political Debates. Proceedings of ACL System Demonstrations. Presented at the Florence, Italy. Florence, Italy.
  6. Bos, U. (2019). Operationalisierung und Charakterisierung der Flächeninanspruchnahme im Rahmen der Ökobilanz. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart.
  7. Bostan, L. A. M., & Klinger, R. (2019). Exploring Fine-Tuned Embeddings that Model Intensifiers for Emotion Analysis. Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational                  Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social                  Media Analysis. Presented at the Minneapolis, USA. Minneapolis, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. Chudinzow, D., Haas, J., Díaz-Ferrán, G., Moreno-Leiva, S., & Eltrop, L. (2019). Simulating the energy yield of a bifacial photovoltaic power plant. Solar Energy, 183, 812–822. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.071
  9. Eberhart, M. (2019). Festelektrolytsensoren zur Messung von atomarem Sauerstoff auf Forschungsraketen (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10395
  10. Eggert, F. (2019). Einfluss der Verdübelung auf das Trag- und Verformungsverhalten von Verbundträgern mit und ohne Profilblech (Institut für Konstruktion und Entwurf). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10399
  11. eule. (2019). test querverweis.
  12. Hagmann, S. (2019). Adaptive Verfeinerungsverfahren in der gitterfreien Finite-Pointset-Methode (FPM) (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10398
  13. Hinze, C., Tomzik, D., Lechler, A., Xu, X., & Verl, A. (2019). Control Architecture for Industrial Robotics based on Container Virtualization. In T. Schüppstuhl, K. Tracht, & J. Roßmann (Eds.), Tagungsband des 4. Kongresses Montage Handhabung Industrieroboter (pp. 64--73; By T. Schüppstuhl, K. Tracht, & J. Roßmann). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  14. HND-BW. (2019a, May 16). Rückblick HND BW Jahreskonferenz 2018, zuletzt geprüft am. Retrieved from https://www.hnd-bw.de/2019/04/24/rueckblick-hnd-bw-jahreskonferenz-2018/
  15. HND-BW. (2019b, May 16). Selbstbericht des Hochschulnetzwerks Digitalisierung der Lehre Baden-Württemberg, zuletzt geprüft am. Retrieved from https://www.hnd-bw.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/HND-BW-Selbstbericht.pdf
  16. Holicki, T., & Scherer, C. W. (2019). Stability Analysis and Output-Feedback Synthesis of Hybrid Systems Affected by Piecewise Constant Parameters via Dynamic Resetting Scalings. Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems.
  17. Hübner, A., Voigt, M., Finke, P., & Riesenweber, C. (2019). Open-Access-Anteil bei Zeitschriftenartikeln von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern an Einrichtungen des Landes Berlin : Datenauswertung für das Jahr 2017. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-7866
  18. J. F. Lachenmaier. (2019). Konzeption und prototypische Implementierung eines entscheidungsunterstützenden IT-Systems für den Einsatz cyber-physischer Produktionssysteme.
  19. Javaid, M. A. (2019). Data mining in GRACE monthly solutions (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10391
  20. Laßmann, P., Fischer, M. S., Bieg, H.-J., Jenke, M., Reichelt, F., Tüzün, G.-J., & Maier, T. (2019). Keeping the balance between overload and underload during partly automated driving: relevant secondary tasks.
  21. Laßmann, Paula. (2019). Nutzerzentrierte Produktentwicklung: Technisches Design für und mit dem Menschen.
  22. Mayer, S. (2019). Finger orientation as an additional input dimension for touchscreens (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10397
  23. Miao, H., Klein, T., Kouřil, D., Mindek, P., Schatz, K., Gröller, M. E., … Viola, I. (2019). Multiscale Molecular Visualization. Journal of Molecular Biology, 431(6), 1049–1070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2018.09.004
  24. Michel, J. (2019). Entwicklung eines Prüfverfahrens zur Qantifizierung des Einflusses mechanischer Spanungszustände auf die Heißrissbildung beim Laserstrahlschweißen von Aluminiumlegierungen.
  25. Mirl, N., Schmid, F., & Spindler, K. (2019). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Senkung der Rücklauftemperatur im Fernwärmenetz. EuroHeat&Power, 48(5), 31–35.
  26. Padó, S., Blessing, A., Blokker, N., Dayanik, E., Haunss, S., & Kuhn, J. (2019). Who Sides With Whom? Towards Computational Construction of Discourse Networks for Political Debates. Proceedings of ACL. Presented at the Florence, Italy. Florence, Italy.
  27. Riegraf, M. (2019). Investigation of sulfur poisoning of Ni-based anodes in solid oxide fuel cells (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10400
  28. Rückle, D. (2019). Das Oxidationsverhalten und die elektrochemische Charakterisierung von Stählen in Nitratschmelzen bei hohen Temperaturen (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10375
  29. Schmidt, E., Reutter, E., Schwartz, M., Vural, H., Ilin, K., Jetter, M., … Siegel, M. (2019). Characterization of a photon-number resolving SNSPD using Poissonian and  sub-Poissonian light. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2019.2905566
  30. Schmidt, J. (2019). A trace gas sensor based on Rydberg excitations : a proof of concept study (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10393
  31. Schnitzer, S. (2019). Real-time scheduling for 3D rendering on automotive embedded systems (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10345
  32. Troiano, E., Padó, S., & Klinger, R. (2019a). Crowdsourcing and Validating Event-focused Emotion Corpora for German and English. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Presented at the Florence, Italy. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  33. Troiano, E., Padó, S., & Klinger, R. (2019b). Crowdsourcing and Validating Event-focused Emotion Corpora for German and English. Proceedings of ACL. Presented at the Florence, Italy. Florence, Italy.
  34. Wang, S., Xu, W., Xu, C., Yin, Z., Bürgmann, R., Liu, L., & Jiang, G. (2019). Changes in Groundwater Level Possibly Encourage Shallow Earthquakes in Central Australia: The 2016 Petermann Ranges Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(6), 3189–3198. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080510
  35. Willenberg, U. (2019). Daseinsvorsorge und politisches Vertrauen (Kommunal- und Schul-Verlag). https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748900450
  36. Xu, G., Xu, C., Wen, Y., & Yin, Z. (2019). Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation of the 2016 MW 6.2 Lampa Earthquake, Southern Peru, Constrained by Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016572
  37. Çelik, O. (2019). Neuartiges Simulationsmodell zur Vorhersage der prozessinduzierten Morphologieausbildung in heterogenen Kunststoffblends. Institut für Kunststofftechnik, Stuttgart.
  38. Blascheck, P. (2018). Gefährdung von Endlagern für radioaktive Abfallstoffe durch Kleinstbeben und deren Überwachung mittels Nanoseismic Monitoring (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10360
  39. Chen, Y.-C. (2018). XMCD investigations on new hard magnetic systems (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10373
  40. Díaz-Ferrán, G., Chudinzow, D., Kracht, W., & Eltrop, L. (2018). Solar-powered pyrolysis of scrap rubber from mining truck end-of-life tires – A case study for the mining industry in the Atacama Desert, Chile. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2033(1), 020003--. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5067012
  41. Goebel, G. (2018). Semi-explicit MPC for classes of linear and nonlinear systems. Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH, Berlin.
  42. Goll, M. (2018). Maßschneidern von elektroaktiven organischen und anorganischen Funktionsmaterialien für elektrochemische Anwendungen (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10392
  43. J. F. Lachenmaier, H. Lasi, H.-G. Kemper und D. Slama. (2018). Interdisziplinäre und kollaborative Lösungsentwicklung im IIoT - Ein Ansatz zur Erstellung neuer Industrial-Internet-of-Things-Lösungen in innovativen Partnerschaften.
  44. Jaensch, F., Csiszar, A., Kienzlen, A., & Verl, A. (2018). Reinforcement Learning of Material Flow Control Logic Using Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation. 2018 First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (AI4I), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/AI4I.2018.8665712
  45. Keselj, M. (2018). Temperatur und Wirkung des bei der gepulsten Laserbearbeitung von CFK entstehenden Materialdampfs.
  46. Klink, C. (2018). Berechnung von Grenzflächeneigenschaften mithilfe der klassischen Dichtefunktionaltheorie mit einem Funktional auf Grundlage der PCP-SAFT Zustandsgleichung (Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Technische Thermodynamik und Thermische Verfahrenstechnik). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10368
  47. Knittel, J., Koch, S., & Ertl, T. (2018). Highlighting Text Regions of Interest with Character-Based LSTM Recurrent Networks. Postersession at the IEEE Conference on Visualization. Presented at the Berlin.
  48. Moreno-Leiva, S., Valencia, F., Haas, J., Chudinzow, D., & Eltrop, L. (2018). Solar energy alternatives for copper production. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2033(1), 020006--. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5067015
  49. Nojabaee, S. M. (2018). Interfacial effects in solid-liquid glyme-based electrolytes for lithium batteries (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10358
  50. Scheufele, K. (2018). Coupling schemes and inexact Newton for multi-physics and coupled optimization problems. Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  51. Sosson, M. (2018). Enzyme-free copying of RNA sequences with monomers, dimers and trimers. Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  52. Wang, L. (2018). Development and investigation of oxygen evolution reaction catalysts for proton exchange membrane electrolyzers (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10359
  53. Wang, S., Xu, C., Xu, W., Yin, Z., Wen, Y., & Jiang, G. (2018). The 2017 M w 6.6 Poso Earthquake: Implications for Extrusion Tectonics in Central Sulawesi. Seismological Research Letters, 90(2A), 649--658.
  54. Zarubin, G. (2018). Ferromagnetic colloids in liquid crystal solvents (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10357
  55. Chudinzow, D., Switon, D., & Eltrop, L. (2017). A solar furnace for copper smelting in Chile - Assessment of economic benefits and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Presented at the Solar World Congress, Abu Dhabi. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18086/swc.2017.26.03
  56. Leininger, S. (2017). Experimentelle Untersuchungen der Kühlbarkeit prototypischer Schüttungskonfigurationen unter dem Aspekt der Reaktorsicherheit (Institut für Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-9103
  57. Recent trends in operator theory and partial differential equations : the Roland Duduchava anniversary volume. (2017). In V. Maz’ya, D. Natroshvili, E. Shargorodsky, & W. L. Wendland (Eds.), Operator Theory : Advances and Applications (No. 258). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47079-5
  58. Moreno-Leiva, S., Díaz-Ferrán, G., Haas, J., Telsnig, T., Díaz-Alvarado, F. A., Palma-Behnke, R., … Eltrop, L. (2017). Towards solar power supply for copper production in Chile: Assessment of global warming potential using a life-cycle approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 242–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.038
  59. Rashid, M. (2017). Coolability of volumetrically heated particle beds (Institut für Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-9214
  60. Selvam, P. K. (2017). Thermal mixing characteristics of flows in horizontal T-junctions (Institut für Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-9160
  61. Knittel, J., & Dingler, T. (2016). Mining Subtitles for Real-Time Content Generation for Second-Screen Applications. In P. Whitney, J. Murray, S. Basapur, N. A. Hasan, & J. Huber (Eds.), TVX (pp. 93–103; By P. Whitney, J. Murray, S. Basapur, N. A. Hasan, & J. Huber). Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/tvx/tvx2016.html#KnittelD16
  62. Kuschewski, M. (2016). Entwicklung und Anwendung von Strömungsmessverfahren zur Untersuchung wandnaher Temperaturfelder (Institut für Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-8748
  63. Lapins, J. (2016). An advanced three-dimensional simulation system for safety analysis of gas cooled reactors (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-2393
  64. Trometer, A. (2016). Investigations on the flooding behaviour of a partially degraded reactor core (Institut für Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-9025
  65. Zwick, M., & Sonnenberger, M. (2016). Der Energieverbrauch in Privathaushalten soziologisch betrachtet. Soziologie Und Nachhaltigkeit - Beiträge Zur Sozial-Ökologischen Transformationsforschung, 02/2016.
  66. Kutter, M. (2015). A two scale model for liquid phase epitaxy with elasticity (PhD dissertation). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-5152
  67. Schleper, V. (2015). Nonlinear transport and coupling of conservation laws (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart.
  68. Venker, J. (2015). Development and validation of models for simulation of supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles and application to self-propelling heat removal systems in boiling water reactors (Institut für Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-2364
  69. Zeiler, C. (2015). Liquid vapor phase transitions : modeling, Riemann solvers and computation. Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  70. Zwick, M. (2014). Was kommt nach dem Studium? Eine qualitative Befragung von AbsolventInnen sozialwissenschaftlicher BA- und MA-Studiengänge an der Universität Stuttgart. Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Risiko- Und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, 32.
  71. Knittel, J., Shirazi, A. S., Henze, N., & Schmidt, A. (2013). Utilizing contextual information for mobile communication. In W. E. Mackay, S. A. Brewster, & S. Bødker (Eds.), 2013 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,              CHI ’13, Paris, France, April 27 - May 2, 2013, Extended Abstracts (pp. 1371--1376; By W. E. Mackay, S. A. Brewster, & S. Bødker). https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468601
  72. Zwick, M. (2013a). Umweltbewusstsein oder Lebenslage? Prädeterminanten des Verkehrsverhaltens. In M. Sonnberger, D. Gallego Carrera, & M. Ruddat (Eds.), Teilen statt besitzen. Analysen und Erkenntnisse zu neuen Mobilitätsformen (pp. 97–124; By M. Sonnberger, D. Gallego Carrera, & M. Ruddat). Bremen.
  73. Zwick, M. (2013b). Wege ins Carsharing. In M. Sonnberger, D. Gallego Carrera, & M. Ruddat (Eds.), Teilen statt besitzen. Analysen und Erkenntnisse zu neuen Mobilitätsformen (pp. 71–90; By M. Sonnberger, D. Gallego Carrera, & M. Ruddat). Bremen.
  74. Albu, R. T., Zacharias, M., Jurkowski, T., & Jeltsch, A. (2012a). DNA interaction of the CcrM DNA methyltransferase: a mutational and modeling stud. 13(9), 1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201200082
  75. Albu, R. T., Zacharias, M., Jurkowski, T., & Jeltsch, A. (2012b). DNA interaction of the CcrM DNA methyltransferase: a mutational and modeling study. 13(9), 1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201200082
  76. Zwick, M. (Ed.). (2012). Juvenile Adipositas aus soziologischer, psychologischer und sozialökologischer Perspektive. In M. Zwick, Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Risiko- und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung (By M. Zwick).
  77. Zwick, M., & Schröter, R. (2012). Konzeption und Durchführung von Fokusgruppen am Beispiel des BMBF-Projekts “Übergewicht und Adipositas bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen als systemisches Risiko.” In M. Schulz, B. Mack, & O. Renn (Eds.), Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft (pp. 24–48). Wiesbaden.
  78. Zwick, M. (2011). Bachelor Sozialwissenschaften. Studienmotivation und soziale Lage. Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Risiko- Und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, 18.
  79. Zwick, M., Deuschle, J., & Renn, O. (Eds.). (2011). Übergewicht und Adipositas bei Kindern und Jugendlichen (By M. Zwick, J. Deuschle, & O. Renn). Wiesbaden.
  80. Zwick, M. (2010a). Die Ursachen der juvenilen Adipositas in der modernen Gesellschaft. In R. Pieper & K.-H. Lang (Eds.), Sicherheits-wissenschaftliches Kolloquium 2008-2009: Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Arbeitsmedizin, Sicherheitstechnik und Ergonomie (pp. 13–29; By R. Pieper & K.-H. Lang). Wuppertal: ASER.
  81. Zwick, M. (2010b). Übergewicht und Adipositas im Kindes- und Jugendalter: Soziale Ursachen und Lösungsansätze. In C. Heintze (Ed.), Adipositas und Public Health (By C. Heintze). Weinheim.
  82. Zwick, M. (2009a). Adipositas bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Aid Special: “Du Isst, Wie Du Bist?” Tagungsband Zum 11. Aid-Forum, 24–37. Bonn.
  83. Zwick, M., & Schröter, R. (2009). Begrenzter Konsens. Präventions- und Therapiemaßnahmen von Übergewicht und Adipositas im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Analyse eines Expertendelphi. Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Risiko- Und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, 11.
  84. Zwick, M. (2009b). Stuttgarter Abbrecherstudie 2009 - Zufriedenheit mit dem Studium und Abbruchneigung bei Studierenden des BA-Studiengangs Sozialwissenschaften an der Universität Stuttgart. Stuttgarter Beiträge Zur Risiko- Und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, 14.
  85. Bamberger, A., Bänsch, E., & Siebert, K. G. (2004). Experimental and numerical investigation of edge tones. 84(9), 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.200310122
  86. Dedner, A., Rohde, C., Schupp, B., & Wesenberg, M. (2004). A parallel, load-balanced MHD code on locally-adapted unstructured grids in 3d. 7(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-004-0140-5
  87. Dedner, A., & Rohde, C. (2004). Numerical approximation of entropy solutions for hyperbolic integro-differential equations. 97(3), 441–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-003-0502-9
  88. Haasdonk, B., Halawani, A., & Burkhardt, H. (2004). Adjustable invariant features by partial Haar-integration. 2, 769–774. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334372
  89. Haasdonk, B., & Bahlmann, C. (2004). Learning with Distance Substitution Kernels. In C. E. Rasmussen, H. H. Bülthoff, B. Schölkopf, & M. A. Giese (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 220–227; By C. E. Rasmussen, H. H. Bülthoff, B. Schölkopf, & M. A. Giese). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28649-3_27
  90. Heine, C.-J. (2004). Isoparametric finite element approximation of curvature on hypersurfaces. In Preprint / Mathematische Fakultät, Freiburg (No. 2004, 26). Freiburg: Math. Inst.
  91. Kühn, K., Ohlberger, M., Schumacher, J., Ziegler, C., & Klöfkorn, R. (2004). A dynamic two-phase flow model of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. In U. Bossel (Ed.), The fuel cell world (2004) (pp. 283–296; By U. Bossel). European Fuel Cell Forum.
  92. Matus, P., Melnik, R., Wang, L., & Rybak, I. (2004). Applications of fully conservative schemes in nonlinear thermoelasticity: modelling shape memory materials. 65(4/5), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2004.01.012
  93. Matus, P., & Rybak, I. (2004). Difference schemes for elliptic equations with mixed derivatives. 4(4), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.2478/cmam-2004-0027
  94. Reisert, M. (2004). Entwicklung von Algorithmen zur lageinvarianten Merkmalsgewinnung für Drahtgittermodelle (PhD dissertation).
  95. Rohde, C., & Thanh, M. D. (2004). Global existence for phase transition problems via a variational scheme. 1(4), 747–768. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219891604000329
  96. Rybak, I. (2004a). Monotone and conservative difference schemes for elliptic equations with mixed derivatives. 9(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13926292.2004.9637250
  97. Rybak, I. (2004b). Monotone and conservative difference schemes for equations with mixed derivatives. 48(1), 45–48.
  98. Rybak, I. (2004c). Monotone and conservative difference schemes for nonlinear nonstationary equations and equations with mixed derivatives (PhD dissertation).
  99. Rybak, I. (2004d). Monotone difference schemes for equations with mixed derivatives in the case of boundary conditions of the third type. 40(1), 37–42.
  100. Vossen, A. (2004). Invariante Kernfunktionen Basierend auf Integration über Transformationen (PhD dissertation).

Best Practices

  1. Austin, C. C., Bloom, T., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Khodiyar, V. K., Murphy, F., Nurnberger, A., … Whyte, A. (2017). Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(2), 77--92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2
  2. Fehr, J., and Jan Heiland, Himpe, C., & Saak, J. (2016). Best practices for replicability, reproducibility and reusability of computer-based experiments exemplified by model reduction software. AIMS Mathematics, 1(3), 261--281. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2016.3.261

Beschreibung von Forschungsdaten

  1. Schembera, B., & Iglezakis, D. (forthcoming). The Genesis of EngMeta - A Metadata Model for Research Data in Computational Engineering. In Metadata and Semantic Research. 12th International Conference, MTSR 2018, Limassol, Cyprus, 23-26 October 2018, Proceedings. Metadata and Semantic Research. 12th International Conference, MTSR 2018, Limassol, Cyprus, 23-26 October 2018, Proceedings. Springer.
  2. Schembera, B., & Iglezakis, D. (2019). The Genesis of EngMeta - A Metadata Model for Research Data in Computational Engineering. In E. Garoufallou, F. Sartori, R. Siatri, & M. Zervas (Eds.), Metadata and Semantic Research (pp. 127–132; By E. Garoufallou, F. Sartori, R. Siatri, & M. Zervas). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_12
  3. Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018). Software Deposit And Preservation Policy And Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310
  4. Fowler, D., Barratt, J., & Walsh, P. (2018). Frictionless Data: Making Research Data Quality Visible. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.577
  5. Group, D. M. W. (2017). DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Version 4.1. https://doi.org/10.5438/0015
  6. Hellerstein, J. M., Sreekanti, V., Gonzalez, J. E., Dalton, J., Dey, A., Nag, S., … others. (2017). Ground: A Data Context Service. CIDR.
  7. Jones, M. B., Boettiger, C., Mayes, A. C., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., … Goble, C. (2017). CodeMeta: an exchange schema for software metadata. Version 2.0. https://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0
  8. Schembera, B., & Bönisch, T. (2017). Challenges of Research Data Management for High Performance Computing. International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, 140--151. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_12
  9. Wilkinson, M. D., Sansone, S.-A., Schultes, E., Doorn, P., Bonino da Silva Santos, L. O., & Dumontier, M. (2017). A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/225490
  10. Kohwalter, T., Oliveira, T., Freire, J., Clua, E., & Murta, L. (2016). Prov Viewer: A Graph-Based Visualization Tool for Interactive Exploration of Provenance Data. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 71--82; By M. Mattoso & B. Glavic). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  11. Pimentel, J. F., Freire, J., Braganholo, V., & Murta, L. (2016). Tracking and Analyzing the Evolution of Provenance from Scripts. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 16--28; By M. Mattoso & B. Glavic). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  12. Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N., & Kozinsky, B. (2016). AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Computational Materials Science, 111, 218–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013
  13. Schreiber, A. (2016). Standardisierung eines erweiterbaren Modells für Provenance-Daten (PROV-SPEC). (2016–04).
  14. Wu, K., Coviello, E. N., Flanagan, S. M., Greenwald, M., Lee, X., Romosan, A., … Wright, J. (2016). MPO: A System to Document and Analyze Distributed Heterogeneous Workflows. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 166--170; By M. Mattoso & B. Glavic). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  15. Belhajjame, K., Zhao, J., Garijo, D., Gable, M., Hettne, K., Palma, R., … Goble, C. (2015). Using a suite of ontologies for preserving workflow-centric research objects. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 32, 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003
  16. Chao, T. (2015). Mapping Methods Metadata for Research Data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.347
  17. Moreau, L., Groth, P., Cheney, J., Lebo, T., & Miles, S. (2015). The rationale of PROV. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 35(4), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.04.001
  18. Starr, J., Castro, E., Crosas, M., Dumontier, M., Downs, R. R., Duerr, R., … Clark, T. (2015). Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications. PeerJ Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1
  19. Farnel, S., & Shiri, A. (2014). Metadata for Research Data: Current Practices and Trends. In W. E. Moen & A. Rushing (Eds.), Dublin Core Conference (pp. 74–82; By W. E. Moen & A. Rushing). Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/dc/dc2014.html#FarnelS14
  20. Grunzke, R., Hesser, J., Starek, J., Kepper, N., Gesing, S., Hardt, M., … Jäkel, R. (2014). Device-Driven Metadata Management Solutions for Scientific Big Data Use Cases. 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing, 317–321.
  21. Grunzke, R., Breuers, S., Gesing, S., Herres-Pawlis, S., Kruse, M., Blunk, D., … Krüger, J. (2014b). Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 26(10), 1744--1759. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3116
  22. Grunzke, R., Breuers, S., Gesing, S., Herres-Pawlis, S., Kruse, M., Blunk, D., … Krüger, J. (2014a). Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 26(10), 1744–1759. Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/concurrency/concurrency26.html#GrunzkeBGHKBGPSSSSSMJNA014
  23. Malik, T. (2014). Geobase: Indexing NetCDF Files for large-scale Data Analysis. In Big Data Management, Technologies, and Applications. Big Data Management, Technologies, and Applications (pp. 295--313). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4699-5.ch012
  24. Tran, H. D., Holt, J., Goodrich, R. W., Mader, J. A., Swain, M., Laity, A. C., … Berriman, G. B. (2014). Metadata and Data Management for the Keck Observatory Archive. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2054830
  25. Bechhofer, S., Buchan, I., de Roure, D., Missier, P., Ainsworth, J., Bhagat, J., … Goble, C. (2013). Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(2), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
  26. Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D., Belhajjame, K., Cheney, J., Corsar, D., … Zhao, J. (2013). PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  27. Sahoo, S., Lebo, T., & McGuinness, D. (2013). PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C.
  28. Lautenschlager, M., Toussaint, F., Thiemann, H., & Reinke, M. (1998). The CERA-2 data model. Retrieved from https://www.pik-potsdam.de/cera/Descriptions/Publications/Papers/9807_DKRZ_TechRep15/cera2.pdf

Anforderungen der Forschungsförderer, politische Entwicklung

  1. für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), B. (Ed.). (2016). Open Access in Deutschland (By B. für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)). Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Open_Access_in_Deutschland.pdf

Kontakt

 

FoKUS - Kompetenzzentrum für Forschungsdaten