Literatur

Sie wollen tiefer einsteigen? Aktuelle Literaturempfehlungen zum Thema Forschungsdatenmanagement.

Rechtliche Fragestellungen

  1. Klimpel, P. (2018). Mehr als Materialbewahrung Über die Bedeutung von Rechteinformationen und Lizenzierung in Bibliotheken. In Lizenzangaben und Rechtedokumentationen im Dialog – Datenflüsse nachhaltig gestalten.
  2. Nationalbibliothek, D. (Ed.). (2018). Lizenzangaben und Rechtedokumentationen im Dialog - Datenflüsse nachhaltig gestalten. (D. Nationalbibliothek).
  3. Hannover, L. U., & Informationsbibliothek, T. (2018). FAQs Zu Rechtlichen Aspekten Im Umgang Mit Forschungsdaten. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1173546
  4. Lauber‐Rönsberg, A., Krahn, P., & Baumann, P. (2018). Gutachten zu den rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen des Forschungsdatenmanagements. Retrieved from https://tu-dresden.de/gsw/jura/igewem/jfbimd13/ressourcen/dateien/publikationen/DataJus_Zusammenfassung_Gutachten_12-07-18.pdf?lang=de
  5. Stietenroth, D., Nieschulze, J., & Arend, K. (2005). Rechtliche Aspekte und Umsetzung des Datenmanagement in internationalen interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekten. Zeitschrift Für Agrarinformatik, 3, 64–75. Retrieved from http://www.gil.de/publications/zai/archiv/11_3_2005.pdf
  6. Guibault, L., & Wiebe, A. (2013). Safe to be open. Study on the protection of research data and recommendations für access and usage. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Forschungssoftware

  1. Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018a). Software Deposit and Preservation Policy and                    Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310
  2. Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018b). Software Deposit And Preservation Policy And Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310
  3. Gundersen, O. E., & Kjensmo, S. (2018). State of the Art: Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence. In S. McIlraith & K. Weinberger, S. McIlraith & K. Weinberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
  4. Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018a). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck, G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age: 27th International Conference, GSCL 2017, Berlin, Germany, September 13-14, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 284--291). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_24
  5. Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018b). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck, G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age: 27th International Conference, GSCL 2017, Berlin, Germany, September 13-14, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 284--291). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_24
  6. Hermann, S., Hahn, U., Gärtner, M., & Fritze, F. (2018). Nachträglich ist nicht gleich nachnutzbar: Ansätze für integrierte Prozessdokumentation im Forschungsalltag: 32-45 Seiten / o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal / herausgegeben vom VDB, Bd. 5 Nr. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5282/O-BIB/2018H3S32-45
  7. Katerbow, M., & Feulner, G. (2018). Handreichung Zum Umgang Mit Forschungssoftware. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1172970
  8. no author. (15.02.2018). Choose an open source license | Choose a License. Retrieved from https://choosealicense.com/
  9. Atkinson, M., Gesing, S., Montagnat, J., & Taylor, I. (2017). Scientific workflows: Past, present and future. Future Generation Computer Systems, 75, 216–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.05.041
  10. da Silva, R. F., Filgueira, R., Pietri, I., Jiang, M., Sakellariou, R., & Deelman, E. (2017). A characterization of workflow management systems for extreme-scale applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 75, 228–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.02.026
  11. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017a). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten Managen. Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/22886/
  12. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017b). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. In E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten managen. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00022886
  13. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017c). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. In E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten managen. https://doi.org/10.11588/heidok.00022886
  14. Hahn, U., Hermann, S., Enderle, P., Fritze, F., Gärtner, M., & Kushnarenko, V. (2017d). RePlay-DH - Realisierung einer Plattform und begleitender Dienste zum Forschungsdatenmanagement für die Fachcommunity - Digital Humanities. E-Science-Tage 2017: Forschungsdaten Managen. Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/22886/
  15. Hong, N. C. (2017, May). Software sustainability - guidelines for the selfish scientist. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4962950.v1
  16. Jones, M. B., Boettiger, C., Mayes, A. C., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., … Goble, C. (2017). CodeMeta: an exchange schema for software metadata. Version 2.0. https://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0
  17. Knoth, C., & Nüst, D. (2017). Reproducibility and Practical Adoption of GEOBIA with Open-Source Software in Docker Containers. Remote Sensing, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030290
  18. Levin, N., & Leonelli, S. (2017). How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(2), 280–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916672071
  19. Nuest, D., Konkol, M., Schutzeichel, M., Pebesma, E., Kray, C., Przibytzin, H., & Lorenz, J. (2017). Opening the Publication Process with Executable Research Compendia. D-Lib Magazine, 23(1/2). https://doi.org/10.1045/january2017-nuest
  20. Scheliga, K. S., Pampel, H., Bernstein, E., Bruch, C., zu Castell, W., Diesmann, M., … Steglich, D. (2017). Helmholtz Open Science Workshop „Zugang zu und Nachnutzung von wissenschaftlicher Software“ #hgfos16 : Report ; November 2016. Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ. https://doi.org/10.2312/lis.17.01
  21. Software Source Code IG (Ed.). (2017a). Software Source Code IG. (Software Source Code IG). Retrieved from https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/software-source-code-ig
  22. Software Source Code IG (Ed.). (2017b). Software Source Code IG. (Software Source Code IG). Retrieved from https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/software-source-code-ig
  23. Artaza, H., Chue Hong, N., Corpas, M., Corpuz, A., Hooft, R., Jimenez, R., … Vaughan, D. (2016). Top 10 metrics for life science software good practices version 1; referees: 2 approved. F1000Research, 5(2000). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9206.1
  24. Borgman, C. L., Golshan, M. S., Sands, A. E., Wallis, J. C., Cummings, R. L., Darch, P. T., & Randles, B. M. (2016). Data Management in the Long Tail: Science, Software, and Service. IJDC, 11(1), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.428
  25. Burgess, L. C., Crotty, D., de Roure, D., Gibbons, J., Goble, C., Missier, P., … O’Beirne, R. (2016). ALAN TURING INSTITUTE SYMPOSIUM ON REPRODUCIBILITY FOR DATA-INTENSIVE RESEARCH--FINAL REPORT.
  26. Druskat, S. (2016). A Proposal for the Measurement and Documentation of Research Software Sustainability in Interactive Metadata Repositories. CoRR. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04529
  27. Fehr, J., and Jan Heiland, Himpe, C., & Saak, J. (2016). Best practices for replicability, reproducibility and reusability of computer-based experiments exemplified by model reduction software. AIMS Mathematics, 1(3), 261--281. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2016.3.261
  28. Hettrick, S. (2016). Research Software Sustainability: Report on a Knowledge Exchange Workshop. Retrieved from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6332/1/Research_Software_Sustainability_Report_on_KE_Workshop_Feb_2016_FINAL.pdf
  29. Howison, J., & Bullard, J. (2016). Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2137--2155. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23538
  30. Katz, D. S., Niemeyer, K. E., Smith, A. M., Anderson, W. L., Boettiger, C., Hinsen, K., … Rios, F. (2016). Software vs. data in the context of citation. PeerJ Preprints, 4, e2630v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2630v1
  31. Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N., & Kozinsky, B. (2016). AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Computational Materials Science, 111, 218–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013
  32. Smith, A. M., Katz, D. S., & Niemeyer, K. E. (2016). Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86
  33. Stodden, V., McNutt, M., Bailey, D. H., Deelman, E., Gil, Y., Hanson, B., … Taufer, M. (2016). Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science, 354(6317), 1240–1241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6168
  34. Stodden, Victoria, McNutt, M., Bailey, D. H., Deelman, E., Gil, Y., Hanson, B., … Taufer, M. (2016). Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science, 354(6317), 1240–1241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6168
  35. Van den Eynden, V., Knight, G., Vlad, A., Radler, B., Tenopir, C., Leon, D., … Corti, L. (2016). Survey of Wellcome researchers and their attitudes to open research. (figshare, figshare, Ed.). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4055448.v1
  36. Wilson, G., Bryan, J., Cranston, K., Kitzes, J., Nederbragt, L., & Teal, T. K. (2016). Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computing. CoRR, abs/1609.00037. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1609.00037
  37. Ahalt, S., Carsey, T., Couch, A., Hooper, R., Ibanez, L., Idaszak, R., … Robinson, E. (2015). NSF Workshop on Supporting Scientific Discovery Through Norms and Practices for Software and Data Citation and Attribution. USA: National Science Foundation.
  38. Allen, A., Berriman, G. B., DuPrie, K., Mink, J., Nemiroff, R., Robitaille, T., … Wallin, J. (2015). Improving Software Citation and Credit. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07919
  39. Boettiger, C. (2015). An Introduction to Docker for Reproducible Research. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 49(1), 71--79. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723872.2723882
  40. McPhillips, T., Song, T., Kolisnik, T., Aulenbach, S., Belhajjame, K., Bocinsky, K., … Ludaescher, B. (2015). YesWorkflow: A User-Oriented, Language-Independent Tool for Recovering  Workflow Information from Scripts. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.02403
  41. Corpas, M., Jimenez, R., Carbon, S. J., García, A., Garcia, L., Goldberg, T., … Hermjakobb, H. (2014). BioJS: an open source standard for biological visualisation – its status in 2014. F1000Research, 3(55). https://doi.org/0.12688/f1000research.3-55.v1
  42. Goodman, A., Pepe, A., Blocker, A. W., Borgman, C. L., Cranmer, K., Crosas, M., … Slavkovic, A. (2014). 10 Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542
  43. Umweltbundesamt (Ed.). (2014). Dokumentation des Fachgesprächs „Nachhaltige Software“ am 28.11.2014. (Umweltbundesamt). Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/378/publikationen/dokumentation_fachgespraech_nachhaltige_software.pdf
  44. Castagné, M. (2013). Institutional repository software comparison: DSpace, EPrints, Digital Commons, Islandora and HydraR. doi: http: / / dx. doi. org /. Retrieved from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/graduateresearch/42591/items/1.0075768
  45. Fomel, S., Sava, P., Vlad, I., Liu, Y., & Bashkardin, V. (2013). Madagascar: open-source software project for multidimensional data analysis and reproducible computational experiments. Journal of Open Research Software, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.ag
  46. Joppa, L. N., McInerny, G., Harper, R., Salido, L., Takeda, K., O’Hara, K., … Emmott, S. (2013). Troubling Trends in Scientific Software Use. Science, 340(6134), 814--815. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231535
  47. Pradal, C., Varoquaux, G., & Langtangen, H. P. (2013). Publishing scientific software matters. J. Comput. Science, 4(5), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2013.08.001
  48. Ram, K. (2013). Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science. Source Code for Biology and Medicine, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-8-7
  49. Sandve, G. K., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., & Hovig, E. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research. PLOS Computational Biology, 9(10), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003285
  50. Winn, J. (2013). Research Data Management using CKAN: A Datastore, Data Repository and Data Catalogue. In IASSIST Conference. IASSIST. Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/iassist/iassist2013.html#Winn13
  51. Pebesma, E., Nüst, D., & Bivand, R. (2012). The R software environment in reproducible geoscientific research. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 93(16), 163--163. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012EO160003
  52. Spatzier, T., Binz, T., Leyman, F., & Breiter, G. (2012). Portable Cloud Services Using TOSCA. IEEE Internet Computing, 16, 80–85. https://doi.org/doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIC.2012.43
  53. Hanson, B., Sugden, A., & Alberts, B. (2011). Making Data Maximally Available. Science, 331(6018), 649. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203354
  54. Stodden, Victoria. (2010). The Scientific Method in Practice: Reproducibility in the Computational Sciences (No. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4773-10). (M. S. R. P. N. 4773-10, M. S. R. P. N. 4773-10, Ed.). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550193
  55. Deelman, E., Gannon, D., Shields, M., & Taylor, I. (2009). Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(5), 528–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.06.012
  56. Roure, D. D., Goble, C., & Stevens, R. (2009). The design and realisation of the Experimentmy Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(5), 561–567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.06.010
  57. McCullough, B. D., McGeary, K. A., & Harrison, T. D. (2008). Do Economics Journal Archives Promote Replicable Research? The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 41(4), 1406–1420. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25478330
  58. Wheeler, D. A. (2007). The Free-Libre / Open Source Software (FLOSS) License Slide.
  59. McGeary, K. A., McCullough, B. D., & Harrison, T. (2006). Lessons from the JMCB archive. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 38(4), 1093–1107. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0061

Befragungen

  1. Mustermann, M., & Musterfrau, E. (2025). Testeintrag.
  2. gavsayv. (2021). Testeunbtag.
  3. Bauer, D. (2019). Verlustanalyse bei elektrischen Maschinen für Elektro- und Hybridfahrzeuge zur Weiterverarbeitung in thermischen Netzwerkmodellen (Wissenschaftliche Reihe Fahrzeugtechnik Universität Stuttgart). Wissenschaftliche Reihe Fahrzeugtechnik Universität Stuttgart. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24272-5
  4. Stegmaier, N. (2019). Regelung von Antriebsstrangprüfständen (Wissenschaftliche Reihe Fahrzeugtechnik Universität Stuttgart). Wissenschaftliche Reihe Fahrzeugtechnik Universität Stuttgart. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24270-1
  5. Brunner, A. (2018). Cryogenic NV scanning probe magnetometry. Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  6. Buchholz, P. C. F. (2018). Data integration and data mining for the exploration of enzymatic sequence-structure-function relationships (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10141
  7. Bykova, I. (2018). High-resolution X-ray ptychography for magnetic imaging (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10137
  8. Clerk, M. de. (2018). Interaktionstechniken zur virtuellen Exterieurbeurteilung im industriellen Automobildesign (Schriftenreihe zu Arbeitswissenschaft und Technologiemanagement No. 44). Schriftenreihe zu Arbeitswissenschaft und Technologiemanagement. Fraunhofer Verlag, Stuttgart.
  9. Cunningham, A. B., Class, H., Ebigbo, A., Gerlach, R., Phillips, A. J., & Hommel, J. (2018). Field-scale modeling of microbially induced calcite precipitation. Computational Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9797-6
  10. Dong, S. (2018). Fast detection of wavefront disturbances using holography-based wavefront sensors (Berichte aus dem Institut für Technische Optik No. 91). Berichte aus dem Institut für Technische Optik. Institut für Technische Optik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
  11. Dorn, K. V. (2018). Synthese und Charakterisierung anionischer sowie lithiumhaltiger Derivate von Seltenerdmetall(III)-Oxidomolybdaten(VI) und -wolframaten(VI). Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  12. Fleischer, J., Merz, S., Baumann, F., Spiller, Q., Möhring, H.-C., & Maier, W. (2018). 3D-Print-Cloud Baden-Württemberg - Eine offene Plattform für die Prozesskette der Additiven Fertigung. Wt-Online, Band 108(7/8), 537–542.
  13. Gredinger, A. (2018). Weiterentwicklung und Erprobung eines semikontinuierlichen Online-Verfahrens zur Bestimmung von Teerkonzentrationen in Biomassevergasungsprozessen (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10135
  14. Gronle, M. (2018). Assistenzbasierte Planung der Datenregistrierung für flexible, multisensorische Inspektionssysteme (Berichte aus dem Institut für Technische Optik No. 92). Berichte aus dem Institut für Technische Optik. Institut für Technische Optik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart.
  15. Hiller, S., Moisa, M., Morar, D., & Pfähler, K. (2018). Leitfaden Additive Manufacturing, Wertschöpfungsszenarien für die erfolgreiche Implementierung von Additive Manufacturing. (Steinbeis-Edition, Steinbeis-Edition, Ed.).
  16. Kaltenbach, C. (2018). Simulation tropfenbeladener Strömungen im Sicherheitsbehälter eines Druckwasserreaktors (IKE. 8 No. 129). IKE. 8. Institut für Kernenergetik und Energiesysteme, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10138
  17. Leuschner, M. (2018). Numerically efficient computational homogenization : Fourier-accelerated nodal solvers and reduced basis model order reduction (Publication series of the Institute of Applied Mechanics (IAM) No. 1). Publication series of the Institute of Applied Mechanics (IAM). Institute of Applied Mechanics (IAM), Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10117
  18. Liebing, M. (2018). Tropfenbildung mittels Hochrotationszerstäubung (Verfahrenstechnik). Verfahrenstechnik. Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  19. Missal, N., Liewald, M., & Felde, A. (2018). Determination of form-filling in manufacturing of hollow components with complex helical internal geometries by ironing.
  20. Missal, N., Liewald, M., Felde, A., & Schwertel, S. (2018). Production of piston pin having a new helical inner profile by cold metal forming.
  21. Mustermann, M. (2018). Testeintrag. Zeitschrift Für Testeinträge.
  22. Möhring, H.-C., Maier, W., & Werkle, K. (2018). Increasing the Accuracy of an Intelligent Milling Tool with Integrated Sensors.
  23. Möhring, H.-C., Kimmelmann, M., Eschelbacher, S., Güzel, K., & Gauggel, C. (2018). Process monitoring on drilling fiber-reinforced plastics and aluminum stacks using acoustic emissions. Procedia Manufacturing, 18, 58–67. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978918313234
  24. Nayak, N. G. (2018). Scheduling & routing time-triggered traffic in time-sensitive networks (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10139
  25. Praditia, T., Helmig, R., & Hajibeygi, H. (2018). Multiscale formulation for coupled flow-heat equations arising from single-phase flow in fractured geothermal reservoirs. Computational Geosciences, 22(5), 1305--1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9754-4
  26. Reinold, P. (2018). From polythiophenes to functional materials : development of complex architectures through polymer analogous modifications (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10145
  27. Rezai, M. (2018). Quantum information processing with photons from a single molecule. Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  28. Scheifele, S., & Riedel, O. (2018). Vom mechatronischen zum Digital Engineering von Maschinen und Anlagen. Atp Plus.
  29. Schilling, M. B. (2018). Optical studies on Dirac and Weyl semimetals (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10140
  30. Schockert, S., & Herzwurm, G. (2018). Agile Software Quality Function Deployment. In M. Tichy, E. Bodden, M. Kuhrmann, S. Wagner, & J.-P. Steghöfer, M. Tichy, E. Bodden, M. Kuhrmann, S. Wagner, & J.-P. Steghöfer (Eds.), Software Engineering und Software Management 2018 (pp. 165–166). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik.
  31. Schweitzer, D. (2018). Experimentelle und simulative Untersuchung der Wasserdampfvergasung von Klärschlamm und weiteren biogenen Brennstoffen (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10136
  32. Thater, J. C., Stubenrauch, C., Glatter, O., Klemmer, H., & Sottmann, T. (2018). Microstructure of ionic liquid (EAN)-rich and oil-rich microemulsions studied by SANS. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP06228E
  33. Verl, A., & Scheifele, S. (2018). Produktions-IT für Losgröße 1. Retrieved from /brokenurl#www.wzm-fachseminar.de
  34. Weldin, D. L. (2018). Ionische Dendrimere als Elektrolyte für Lithium-Schwefel-Batterien (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-10142
  35. Wild, P. (2018). Untersuchungen zur Porenbildung in bleifreien Lötverbindungen und deren Einfluss auf die Zuverlässigkeit unter Wechselbelastung. Verlag Dr. Hut, München.
  36. Yang, G., Weigand, B., Terzis, A., Weishaupt, K., & Helmig, R. (2018). Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow and Heat Transfer in a Three-Dimensional Channel Coupled with Flow Through Porous Structures. Transport in Porous Media, 122(1), 145--167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-017-0995-9
  37. Bosler, M., Jud, C., & Herzwurm, G. (2017). Platforms and Ecosystems for Connected Car Services. In S. Hyrynsalmi, A. Suominen, C. Jud, & J. Bosch, S. Hyrynsalmi, A. Suominen, C. Jud, & J. Bosch (Eds.), Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems (pp. 16–27). Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwiqiJ_Y3ZrfAhURNOwKHdBKBmwQFjABegQICBAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fprofile%2FSami_Hyrynsalmi%2Fpublication%2F322686634_Proceedings_of_the_9th_International_Workshop_on_Software_Ecosystems%2Flinks%2F5a68d7940f7e9b2a828c44a8%2FProceedings-of-the-9th-International-Workshop-on-Software-Ecosystems.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1zm1VK6EufUTfiklMBRLJD
  38. Dellermann, D., Jud, C., & Reck, F. (2017). Understanding Platform Loyalty in the Cloud: A Configurational View on ISV´s Costs and Benefits. In J. M. Leimeister & W. Brenner, J. M. Leimeister & W. Brenner (Eds.), Towards Thought Leadership in Digital Transformation (pp. 514–528). St. Gallen: Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik. Retrieved from https://www.wi2017.ch/images/tagungsband_wi_2017.pdf
  39. Dellermann, Dominik, Jud, C., & Reck, F. (2017a). Connected-Car-Services: eine Klassifikation der Plattformen für das vernetzte Automobil, 54(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-017-0318-1
  40. Dellermann, Dominik, Jud, C., & Reck, F. (2017b). Plattform-Loyalität in der Cloud. HMD Praxis Der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 54(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-017-0318-1
  41. Dellermann, Dominik, & Jud, C. (2017). Towards Vivid Ecosystems: Configuring Costs and Benefits via Design Choices. In P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp, P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Workshop on Software Ecosystems 2016. Norderstedt: BoD - Books on Demand.
  42. Fetzer, M. (2017). From classical absolute stability tests towards a comprehensive robustness analysis (PhD dissertation). Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-9726
  43. Herzwurm, G., & Jud, C. (2017). Manage multiple Platform-Ecosystems. In P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp, P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp (Eds.), Proceedings of European Workshop on Software Ecosystems (EWSECO) 2017.
  44. Jud, C. (2017). The Influence of Platforms on Software Products. In P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp, P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Workshop on Software Ecosystems 2016. Norderstedt: BoD - Books on Demand.
  45. Mikusz, M., Schäfer, T., Taraba, T., & Jud, C. (2017). Transforming the Connected Car into a Business Model Innovation. In 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (Vol. 01, pp. 247–256). https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2017.64
  46. Schönhofen, F., & Schockert, S. (2017). Das Business Model House of Quality: Bewertung plattformbasierter Geschäftsmodelle mit Quality Function  Deployment. In J. M. Leimeister & W. Brenner, J. M. Leimeister & W. Brenner (Eds.), Towards Thought Leadership in Digital Transformation (pp. 1477–1488). Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik. Retrieved from https://www.wi2017.ch/images/tagungsband_wi_2017.pdf
  47. Schönhofen, Felix, Petrik, D., Schockert, S., & Herzwurm, G. (2017). Analysis of platform-based Business Models using Quality Function Deployment. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Quality Function Deployment (ISQFD’17) (pp. 65–79).
  48. Straub, D., Petrik, D., Schönhofen, F., Herzwurm, G., & Kuolt, H. (2017). Geschäftsmodellentwicklung für vernetzte Vakuumsauggreifer. In E. Müller, E. Müller (Ed.), Arbeitswelten 4.0 : Chancen, Herausforderungen, Lösungen : 09.-10. November 2017, Tagungsband : TBI 2017, 16. Tage des Betriebs- und Systemingenieurs (pp. 33–44). Chemnitz: Technische Universität Chemnitz, Institut für Betriebswissenschaften und Fabriksysteme.
  49. Tauterat, T., Sieben, K., & Herzwurm, G. (2017). Konzeption und prototypische Entwicklung einer mobilen Applikation zur Unterstützung der Investitionsentscheidung von Predictive Maintenance. Stuttgarter Schriften zur Unternehmenssoftware. Stuttgart: Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Wirtschaftsinformatik II.
  50. Dellermann, Dominik, Jud, C., & Popp, K. M. (2016). Why don’t they join? Analyzing the Nature and Consequences of Complementors’ Costs in Platform Ecosystems. In P. Ågerfalk, N. Levina, & S. S. Kien, P. Ågerfalk, N. Levina, & S. S. Kien (Eds.), ICIS. Association for Information Systems. Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icis/icis2016.html#DellermannJP16
  51. Hartter, A., Tauterat, T., & Herzwurm, G. (2016). Predictive Maintenance - Chancen und Risiken in der Smart Factory sowie Softwareeinsatz heute - Ergebnisbericht zur Online-Befragung -. Stuttgarter Schriften zur Unternehmenssoftware. Stuttgart: Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Wirtschaftsinformatik II (Unternehmenssoftware).
  52. Herzwurm, G., Schockert, S., & Tauterat, T. (2016). A Critical Analysis of Software QFD publications. In QFD transactions from the Symposium on Quality Function Deployment (pp. 171–200). Ann Arbor, MI, USA: QFD Institute.
  53. Herzwurm, G. (2016a). ISO 16355-01:2015-02. In H.-D. Zollondz, M. Ketting, & R. Pfundtner, H.-D. Zollondz, M. Ketting, & R. Pfundtner (Eds.), Lexikon Qualitätsmanagement (2., komplett überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, pp. 502–503). Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
  54. Herzwurm, G. (2016b). Personenstichwort Akao, Yoji. In H.-D. Zollondz, M. Ketting, & R. Pfundtner, H.-D. Zollondz, M. Ketting, & R. Pfundtner (Eds.), Lexikon Qualitätsmanagement (2., komplett überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, pp. 30–32). Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
  55. Herzwurm, G., & Schockert, S. (2016). Software-QFD. In H.-D. Zollondz, M. Ketting, & R. Pfundtner, H.-D. Zollondz, M. Ketting, & R. Pfundtner (Eds.), Lexikon Qualitätsmanagement (2., komplett überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, pp. 1085–1092). Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
  56. Jud, C. (2016). Platforms and ecosystems from complementors´ point of view. In P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp, P. Buxmann, T. A. Curran, G. Eichler, S. Jansen, T. Kude, & K. M. Popp (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Workshop on Software Ecosystems 2015. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
  57. Martin, U., Herzwurm, G., Camacho Alcocer, D., & Krams, B. (2016). Ehrenamtlich organisierte Mobilität im ländlichen Raum mit Elektrofahrzeugen: Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts „EFB - e-Fahrdienst Boxberg“. Neues verkehrswissenschaftliches Journal (1. Auflage). Norderstedt: BoD - Books on Demand.
  58. Mikusz, M., & Herter, T. (2016). How do Consumers evaluate Value Propositions of connected Car Services? In 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2016, San Diego, CA, USA, August 11-14, 2016 (pp. 1–10). Atlanta, Ga: Association for Information Systems.
  59. Pelzl, N., Helferich, A., & Herzwurm, G. (2016). Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Reifegradmodells für das Cloud-Produktmanagement. In V. Nissen, V. Nissen (Ed.) (Vol. 2, pp. 994–1004). Ilmenau: Universitätsverlag.
  60. Sommer, M., & Alfred-Kröner-Verlag. (2016). Römische Geschichte Von den Anfängen bis zum Untergang.
  61. Camacho, D., & Krams, B. (2015). „Bürger fahren für Bürger“ im ländlichen Raum. Erkenntnisse aus dem Forschungsprojekt „e-Fahrdienst Boxberg“. Verkehrszeichen Für Mobilität Und Umwelt, 31(3), 13–18.
  62. Engstler, M., Fazal-Baqaie, M., Hanser, E., Mikusz, M., & Volland, A. (Eds.). (2015). Projektmanagement und Vorgehensmodelle 2015 : hybride Projektstrukturen erfolgreich umsetzen : gemeinsame Tagung der Fachgruppen Projektmanagement (WI-PM) und Vorgehensmodelle (WI-VM) im Fachgebiet Wirtschaftsinformatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. ; 22. und 23. Oktober 2015 in Elmshorn. (M. Engstler, M. Fazal-Baqaie, E. Hanser, M. Mikusz, & A. Volland), GI-Edition : lecture notes in informatics. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
  63. Islam, S. M. R., Kwak, D., Kabir, H., Hossain, M. M., & Kwak, K. S. (2015). The Internet of Things for Health Care: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access, 3, 678–708.
  64. Jud, C. (2015). Business Models for Platform-Based Digital Services – Stakeholder Expectations. In J. M. Fernandes, R. J. Machado, & K. Wnuk, J. M. Fernandes, R. J. Machado, & K. Wnuk (Eds.), Software Business. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19593-3
  65. Lenz, A., Schoop, M., & Herzwurm, G. (2015). Requirements Analysis as a Negotiation Process. In G. E. Kamiński & T. S. Kersten, G. E. Kamiński & T. S. Kersten (Eds.), Outlooks and insights on group decision and negotiation (pp. 303–309). Cham: Springer.
  66. Schockert, S., & Herzwurm, G. (2015). Das Business setzt die Prioritäten?! In M. Engstler, M. Fazal-Baqaie, E. Hanser, M. Mikusz, & A. Volland, M. Engstler, M. Fazal-Baqaie, E. Hanser, M. Mikusz, & A. Volland (Eds.), Projektmanagement und Vorgehensmodelle 2015 (pp. 151–158). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
  67. Tauterat, T. (2015). Development of a method for the economic evaluation of predictive maintenance. In João M. Fernandes, R. J. Machado, & K. Wnuk, João M. Fernandes, R. J. Machado, & K. Wnuk (Eds.), Software business (pp. 179–185). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19593-3_16
  68. Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., Pellegrini, F. D., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516. Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/adhoc/adhoc10.html#MiorandiSPC12
  69. Frey, J., Lieder, C., Schölkopf, T., Schleid, T., Nieken, U., Klemm, E., & Hunger, M. (2010). Quantitative solid-state NMR investigation of V5+ species in VPO catalysts upon sequential selective oxidation of n-butane. Journal of Catalysis, 272(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.03.004
  70. Lieder, C., Opelt, S., Dyballa, M., Henning, H., Klemm, E., & Hunger, M. (2010). Adsorbate effect on AlO4(OH)2 centers in the metal-organic framework MIL-53 investigated by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and Interfaces, 114(39), 16596–16602. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105700b
  71. Marthala, V. R. R., Rabl, S., & Hunger, M. (2008). Solid-state MAS NMR studies on the vapor-phase Beckmann rearrangement of 15N-cyclohexanone oxime.
  72. Backofen, R., Borrmann, H.-G., Deck, W., Dedner, A., De Raedt, L., Desch, K., … Winterer, V.-H. (2006). A Bottom-up approach to Grid-Computing at a University: the Black-Forest-Grid  Initiative. Praxis Der Informationsverarbeitung Und Kommunikation, 29(2), 81–87.
  73. Barth, A. (2006). Distribution of the First Rendezvous Time of Two Geometric  Brownian Motions (Master thesis). University of Mannheim.
  74. Bastian, P., Blatt, M., Dedner, A., Engwer, C., Kloefkorn, R., Kuttanikkad, S. P., … Sander, O. (2006). The Distributed and Unified Numerics Environment (DUNE). In Proc. of the 19th Symposium on Simulation Technique in Hannover,  Sep. 12 - 14.
  75. Becker, H., Baden-Württemberg, L., & für Baden-Württemberg GmbH <Stuttgart>, S. (Eds.). (2006). Der Limes: römische Grenze zwischen Rhein und Donau; Geschichte und Archäologie - ein Denkmal entdecken. (H. Becker, L. Baden-Württemberg, & S. für Baden-Württemberg GmbH <Stuttgart>) (2., akt. u. erw. Aufl.). Stuttgart: Staatsanzeiger-Verl.
  76. Burri, A., Dedner, A., Diehl, D., Kloefkorn, R., & Ohlberger, M. (2006). A general object oriented framework for discretizing non-linear evolution  equations. In Y. S. et al., Y. S. et al. (Ed.), Advances in High Performance Computing and Computational Sciences (Vol. 93, pp. 69–87). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33844-4_7
  77. Burri, A., Dedner, A., Kloefkorn, R., & Ohlberger, M. (2006). An efficient implementation of an adaptive and parallel grid in DUNE. In E. K. et al., E. K. et al. (Ed.), Computational Science and High Performance Computing II (Vol. 91, pp. 67–82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31768-6_7
  78. Diehl, D., & Rohde, C. (2006). On the structure of MHD shock waves in diffusive-dispersive media. J. Math. Fluid Mech., 8(1), 120--145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-004-0149-z
  79. Goeddeke, D., Becker, C., & Turek, S. (2006). Integrating GPUs as fast co-processors into the parallel FE package  FEAST. In M. Becker & H. Szczerbicka, M. Becker & H. Szczerbicka (Eds.), 19th Symposium Simulationstechnique (ASIM’06) (pp. 277--282).
  80. Haasdonk, B., & Ohlberger, M. (2006). Reduced Basis Method for Finite Volume Approximations of Parametrized  Evolution Equations (No. 12/2006). University of Freiburg, Institute of Applied Mathematics.
  81. Haink, J., & Rohde, C. (2006). Phase transition in compressible media and nonlocal capillarity terms. In Hyperbolic problems: theory, numerics and applications. I (pp. 147--154). Yokohama Publ., Yokohama.
  82. Heine, C.-J. (2006). Computations of form and stability of rotating drops with finite  elements. IMA J. Numer. Anal., 26(4), 723--751.
  83. Jovanović, V., & Rohde, C. (2006). Error estimates for finite volume approximations of classical solutions  for nonlinear systems of hyperbolic balance laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 43(6), 2423--2449 (electronic). https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142903438136
  84. Merkle, C., & Rohde, C. (2006). Computation of dynamical phase transitions in solids. Appl. Numer. Math., 56(10–11), 1450--1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2006.03.025
  85. Morell, J., Güngerich, M., Wolter, G., Jiao, J., Hunger, M., Klar, P. J., & Fröba, M. (2006). Synthesis and characterization of highly ordered bifunctional aromatic periodic mesoporous organosilicas with different pore sizes. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 16(27), 2809–2818. https://doi.org/10.1039/B603458F
  86. Nochetto, R. H., Schmidt, A., Siebert, K. G., & Veeser, A. (2006). Pointwise A Posteriori Error Estimates for Monotone Semi-linear Equations. Numerische Mathematik, 104(4), 515–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-006-0027-0
  87. Peschke, K.-D., Haasdonk, B., Ronneberger, O., Burkhard, H., Roesch, P., Harz, M., & Popp, J. (2006). Using Transformation Knowledge for the Classification of Raman  Spectra of Biological Samples. In BIOMED 2006, Proc. of the 4th IASTED International Conference on  Biomedical Engineering (pp. 288–293).
  88. Strzodka, R., & Goeddeke, D. (2006a). Mixed Precision Methods for Convergent Iterative Schemes. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Edge Computing Using New Commodity Architectures (p. D-59--60). Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7113786
  89. Strzodka, R., & Goeddeke, D. (2006b). Pipelined Mixed Precision Algorithms on FPGAs for Fast and Accurate  PDE Solvers from Low Precision Components. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual IEEE Symposium on Field-Programmable  Custom Computing Machines (FCCM’06) (pp. 259--270). https://doi.org/10.1109/FCCM.2006.57
  90. Wang, W., Jiao, J., Jiang, Y., Ray, S. S., & Hunger, M. (2005). Formation and decomposition of surface ethoxy species on acidic zeolite Y. ChemPhysChem, 6(8), 1467–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200500262
  91. Altwasser, S., Raichle, A., Traa, Y., & Weitkamp, J. (2004). Herstellung galliumhaltiger Katalysatoren durch Festkörperreaktion saurer Zeolithe mit elementarem Gallium. Chemie - Ingenieur - Technik, 76(1–2), 140–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.200403326
  92. Buchholz, A., Wang, W., Jiao, J., & Hunger, M. (2004). Preparation and characterization of mesoporous silicoaluminophosphates.
  93. Hunger, M., & Weitkamp, J. (2004). In situ magnetic resonance techniques. In B. M. Weckhuysen, B. M. Weckhuysen (Ed.), In-situ spectroscopy of catalysts (pp. 177–218). Stevenson Ranch, Calif.: American Scientific Publishers.
  94. Buchholz, A., Wang, W., Arnold, A., Xu, M., & Hunger, M. (2003). Successive steps of hydration and dehydration of silicoaluminophosphates H-SAPO-34 and H-SAPO-37 investigated by in situ CF MAS NMR spectroscopy. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 57(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(02)00562-0
  95. Hunger, M. (2003). Recent applications of in situ NMR spectroscopy in heterogeneous catalysis.
  96. Schüth, F., Sing, K. S. W., & Weitkamp, J. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of porous solids. (F. Schüth, K. S. W. Sing, & J. Weitkamp). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
  97. Hunger, M. (2001). Modern applications of in situ NMR spectroscopy in heterogeneous catalysis.
  98. Hunger, M., Schenk, U., Breuninger, M., Gläser, R., & Weitkamp, J. (1999). Characterization of the acid sites in MCM-41-type materials by spectroscopic and catalytic techniques. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 27(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(98)00260-1
  99. Hunger, M. (1999). Moderne Anwendungen der In-situ-NMR-Spektroskopie in der heterogenen Katalyse. Institute of Chemical Technology, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
  100. Dauns, H., & Weitkamp, J. (1986). Modelluntersuchungen zum Isomerisieren und Hydrocracken von Alkan-Gemischen an einem Pd/La-Y-Zeolith-Katalysator. In Verfahrenstechnik 1985 (pp. 893–900). Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

Best Practices

  1. Austin, C. C., Bloom, T., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Khodiyar, V. K., Murphy, F., Nurnberger, A., … Whyte, A. (2017). Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(2), 77--92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2
  2. Fehr, J., and Jan Heiland, Himpe, C., & Saak, J. (2016). Best practices for replicability, reproducibility and reusability of computer-based experiments exemplified by model reduction software. AIMS Mathematics, 1(3), 261--281. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2016.3.261

Beschreibung von Forschungsdaten

  1. Schembera, B., & Iglezakis, D. (forthcoming). The Genesis of EngMeta - A Metadata Model for Research Data in Computational Engineering. In Metadata and Semantic Research. 12th International Conference, MTSR 2018, Limassol, Cyprus, 23-26 October 2018, Proceedings. Springer.
  2. Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018). Software Deposit And Preservation Policy And Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310
  3. Fowler, D., Barratt, J., & Walsh, P. (2018). Frictionless Data: Making Research Data Quality Visible. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.577
  4. Group, D. M. W. (2017). DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Version 4.1. https://doi.org/10.5438/0015
  5. Hellerstein, J. M., Sreekanti, V., Gonzalez, J. E., Dalton, J., Dey, A., Nag, S., … others. (2017). Ground: A Data Context Service. In CIDR.
  6. Jones, M. B., Boettiger, C., Mayes, A. C., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., … Goble, C. (2017). CodeMeta: an exchange schema for software metadata. Version 2.0. https://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0
  7. Schembera, B., & Bönisch, T. (2017). Challenges of Research Data Management for High Performance Computing. In International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (pp. 140--151). Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_12
  8. Wilkinson, M. D., Sansone, S.-A., Schultes, E., Doorn, P., Bonino da Silva Santos, L. O., & Dumontier, M. (2017). A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/225490
  9. Kohwalter, T., Oliveira, T., Freire, J., Clua, E., & Murta, L. (2016). Prov Viewer: A Graph-Based Visualization Tool for Interactive Exploration of Provenance Data. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic, M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 71--82). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  10. Pimentel, J. F., Freire, J., Braganholo, V., & Murta, L. (2016). Tracking and Analyzing the Evolution of Provenance from Scripts. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic, M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 16--28). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  11. Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N., & Kozinsky, B. (2016). AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Computational Materials Science, 111, 218–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013
  12. Schreiber, A. (2016). Standardisierung eines erweiterbaren Modells für Provenance-Daten (PROV-SPEC), (2016–04).
  13. Wu, K., Coviello, E. N., Flanagan, S. M., Greenwald, M., Lee, X., Romosan, A., … Wright, J. (2016). MPO: A System to Document and Analyze Distributed Heterogeneous Workflows. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic, M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 166--170). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  14. Belhajjame, K., Zhao, J., Garijo, D., Gable, M., Hettne, K., Palma, R., … Goble, C. (2015). Using a suite of ontologies for preserving workflow-centric research objects. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 32, 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003
  15. Chao, T. (2015). Mapping Methods Metadata for Research Data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.347
  16. Moreau, L., Groth, P., Cheney, J., Lebo, T., & Miles, S. (2015). The rationale of PROV. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 35(4), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.04.001
  17. Starr, J., Castro, E., Crosas, M., Dumontier, M., Downs, R. R., Duerr, R., … Clark, T. (2015). Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications. PeerJ Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1
  18. Farnel, S., & Shiri, A. (2014). Metadata for Research Data: Current Practices and Trends. In W. E. Moen & A. Rushing, W. E. Moen & A. Rushing (Eds.), Dublin Core Conference (pp. 74–82). Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/dc/dc2014.html#FarnelS14
  19. Grunzke, R., Hesser, J., Starek, J., Kepper, N., Gesing, S., Hardt, M., … Jäkel, R. (2014). Device-Driven Metadata Management Solutions for Scientific Big Data Use Cases. In 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (pp. 317–321).
  20. Grunzke, R., Breuers, S., Gesing, S., Herres-Pawlis, S., Kruse, M., Blunk, D., … Krüger, J. (2014b). Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 26(10), 1744--1759. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3116
  21. Grunzke, R., Breuers, S., Gesing, S., Herres-Pawlis, S., Kruse, M., Blunk, D., … Krüger, J. (2014a). Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 26(10), 1744–1759. Retrieved from http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/concurrency/concurrency26.html#GrunzkeBGHKBGPSSSSSMJNA014
  22. Malik, T. (2014). Geobase: Indexing NetCDF Files for large-scale Data Analysis. In Big Data Management, Technologies, and Applications (pp. 295--313). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4699-5.ch012
  23. Tran, H. D., Holt, J., Goodrich, R. W., Mader, J. A., Swain, M., Laity, A. C., … Berriman, G. B. (2014). Metadata and Data Management for the Keck Observatory Archive. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2054830
  24. Bechhofer, S., Buchan, I., de Roure, D., Missier, P., Ainsworth, J., Bhagat, J., … Goble, C. (2013). Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(2), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004
  25. Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., McGuinness, D., Belhajjame, K., Cheney, J., Corsar, D., … Zhao, J. (2013). PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/
  26. Sahoo, S., Lebo, T., & McGuinness, D. (2013). PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C.
  27. Lautenschlager, M., Toussaint, F., Thiemann, H., & Reinke, M. (1998). The CERA-2 data model. Retrieved from https://www.pik-potsdam.de/cera/Descriptions/Publications/Papers/9807_DKRZ_TechRep15/cera2.pdf

Anforderungen der Forschungsförderer, politische Entwicklung

  1. für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), B. (Ed.). (2016). Open Access in Deutschland. (B. für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)). Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Open_Access_in_Deutschland.pdf

Kontakt

 

FoKUS - Kompetenzzentrum für Forschungsdaten