Literatur

Sganga, C., Gebreyesus, N. H., van Wezel, J., Foggetti, N., Amram, D., & Drago, F. (2022). EOSC-Pillar Legal Compliance Guidelines for Researchers: a Checklist (interactive digital version). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6327668

Wirth, T. (2020). Die Pflicht zur Löschung von Forschungsdaten – Urheber- und Datenschutzrecht im Widerspruch zu den Erfordernissen guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis? Zeitschrift Für Urheber- Und Medienrecht (ZUM), 64, Article 8/9. https://www.zew.de/publikationen/die-pflicht-zur-loeschung-von-forschungsdaten-urheber-und-datenschutzrecht-im-widerspruch-zu-den-erfordernissen-guter-wissenschaftlicher-praxis

Ostendorff, P., & Linke, D. (2019). Best-Practices im Umgang mit rechtlichen Fragestellungen zum Forschungsdatenmanagement (FDM). Bibliotheksdienst, 53, Article 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/bd-2019-0098

Stietenroth, D., Nieschulze, J., & Arend, K. (2005). Rechtliche Aspekte und Umsetzung des Datenmanagement in internationalen interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekten. Zeitschrift Für Agrarinformatik, 3, 64–75. http://www.gil.de/publications/zai/archiv/11_3_2005.pdf

Kubis, M., Naczinsky, M., Selzer, A., Sperlich, T., Steiner, S., & Waldmann, U. (2019). Der digitale nachlass - Eine Untersuchung aus rechtlicher und technischer Sicht (F.-I. für Sichere Informationstechnologie, U. Bremen/IGMR, & U. Regensburg, Eds.). https://doi.org/10.24406/sit-n-572149

Brettschneider, P., Axtmann, A., Böker, E., & von Suchodoletz, D. (2021). Offene Lizenzen für Forschungsdaten - Rechtliche Bewertung und Praxistauglichkeit verbreiteter Lizenzmodelle. O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal, 8, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/5749

Guibault, L., & Wiebe, A. (2013). Safe to be open. Study on the protection of research data and recommendations für access and usage. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Lauber‐Rönsberg, A., Krahn, P., & Baumann, P. (2018). Gutachten zu den rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen des Forschungsdatenmanagements. https://tu-dresden.de/gsw/jura/igewem/jfbimd13/ressourcen/dateien/publikationen/DataJus_Zusammenfassung_Gutachten_12-07-18.pdf?lang=de

Hannover, L. U., & Informationsbibliothek, T. (2018). FAQs Zu Rechtlichen Aspekten Im Umgang Mit Forschungsdaten. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1173546

Johannes, P. C., Potthoff, J., Roßnagel, A., Neumair, B., Madiesh, M., & Hackel, S. (2013). Beweissicheres elektronisches Laborbuch (Nomos, Ed.).

Volkmann, S., Feiten, L., Zimmermann, C., Sester, S., Wehle, L., & Becker, B. (2016). Digitale Tarnkappe: Anonymisierung in Videoaufnahmen. In H. C. Mayr & M. Pinzger (Eds.), GI-Jahrestagung: Vol. P-259 (pp. 413–426). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/gi/gi2016.html#VolkmannFZSWB16

Käde, L. (2021). Kreative Maschinen und Urheberrecht (1 ed., Vol. 2). Nomos. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783748912453/kreative-maschinen-und-urheberrecht?page=1

Sganga, C., Gebreyesus, N. H., van Wezel, J., Foggetti, N., Amram, D., & Drago, F. (2022). EOSC-Pillar Legal Compliance Guidelines for Researchers: a Checklist (interactive digital version). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6327668

Meyermann, A., & Porzelt, M. (2014). Hinweise zur Anonymisierung von qualitativen Daten. Forschungsdaten Bildung Informiert, Article 1. https://www.forschungsdaten-bildung.de/get_files.php?action=get_file&file=fdb-informiert-nr-1.pdf

Ebel, T., & Meyermann, A. (2015). Hinweise zur Anonymisierung von quantitativen Daten. Forschungsdaten Bildung Informiert, Article 3. https://www.forschungsdaten-bildung.de/get_files.php?action=get_file&file=fdb-informiert-nr-3.pdf

Klimpel, P. (2018). Mehr als Materialbewahrung Über die Bedeutung von Rechteinformationen und Lizenzierung in Bibliotheken. Lizenzangaben Und Rechtedokumentationen Im Dialog – Datenflüsse Nachhaltig Gestalten.

Nationalbibliothek, D. (2018). Lizenzangaben und Rechtedokumentationen im Dialog - Datenflüsse nachhaltig gestalten.

Kreutzer, T., & Lahmann, H. (2019). Rechtsfragen bei Open Science. Hamburg University Press. https://doi.org/10.15460/HUP.195

Kleinkopf, F., Jacke, J., & Gärtner, M. (2021). Urheberrechtliche Grenzen der Nachnutzung wissenschaftlicher Korpora bei computergestützten Verfahren und digitalen Ressourcen.

Depping, R. (2023). Rechtliche Aspekte des Forschungsdatenmanagements - Eine Einführung.

Kreutzer, T., & Fischer, G. (2023). Urheberrecht in der Wissenschaft. Ein Überblick für Forschung, Lehre und Bibliotheken. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8284551

Baumann, P. (2023). Rechte an Forschungsdaten [Trier University]. https://doi.org/10.25353/UBTR-81E9-927D-E6DD

Castro, L. J., Ferenz, S., Hajiabadi, H., Kuckertz, P., Löbe, M., Schmidt, C., Struck, A., & Thiery, F. (2024). Results on a Survey on Research Software Metadata in the NFDI Consortia. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12704414

David, M., Colom, M., Garijo, D., Castro, L. J., Louvet, V., Ronchieri, E., Torquati, M., del Caño, L., Cerlane, L., Van den Bossche, M., Campos, I., & Di Cosmo, R. (2024). Ensure Software Quality. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723608

David, M., Colom, M., Garijo, D., Castro, L. J., Louvet, V., Ronchieri, E., Torquati, M., del Caño, L., Cerlane, L., Van den Bossche, M., Campos, I., & Di Cosmo, R. (2024). Ensure Software Quality. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723608

Flemisch, B., Hermann, S., Herschel, M., Pflüger, D., Pleiss, J., Range, J., Roy, S., Takamoto, M., & Uekermann, B. (2024). Research Data Management in Simulation Science: Infrastructure, Tools, and Applications. Datenbank-Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-024-00475-4

Felderer, M., Goedicke, M., Grunske, L., Hasselbring, W., Lamprecht, A.-L., & Rumpe, B. (2023). Toward Research Software Engineering Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8020525

Gruenpeter, M., Granger, S., Monteil, A., Chue Hong, N., Breitmoser, E., Antonioletti, M., Garijo, D., González Guardia, E., Gonzalez Beltran, A., Goble, C., Soiland-Reyes, S., Juty, N., & Mejias, G. (2023). D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8097537

Gruenpeter, M., Granger, S., Monteil, A., Chue Hong, N., Breitmoser, E., Antonioletti, M., Garijo, D., González Guardia, E., Gonzalez Beltran, A., Goble, C., Soiland-Reyes, S., Juty, N., & Mejias, G. (2023). D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8097537

Gruenpeter, M., Granger, S., Monteil, A., Chue Hong, N., Breitmoser, E., Antonioletti, M., Garijo, D., González Guardia, E., Gonzalez Beltran, A., Goble, C., Soiland-Reyes, S., Juty, N., & Mejias, G. (2023). D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8097537

Koch, T., Gläser, D., Seeland, A., Roy, S., Schulze, K., Weishaupt, K., Boehringer, D., Hermann, S., & Flemisch, B. (2023). A sustainable infrastructure concept for improved accessibility, reusability, and archival of research software.

Koch, T., Gläser, D., Seeland, A., Roy, S., Schulze, K., Weishaupt, K., Boehringer, D., Hermann, S., & Flemisch, B. (2023). A sustainable infrastructure concept for improved accessibility, reusability, and archival of research software.

Selzer, M. (2023). Kadi4Mat - Karlsruhe Data Infrastructure for Materials Science [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8424794

Druskat, S., Bertuch, O., Juckeland, G., Knodel, O., & Schlauch, T. (2022). Software publications with rich metadata: state of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept.

Druskat, S., Bertuch, O., Juckeland, G., Knodel, O., & Schlauch, T. (2022). Software publications with rich metadata: state of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept.

Hirsch, M., Iglezakis, D., Leymann, F., & Zimmermann, M. (2022). The ReSUS Project - Infrastructure for Sharing Research Software. In E-Science-Tage 2021: Share Your Research Data (pp. 267–276). heiBOOKS. https://doi.org/10.11588/HEIBOOKS.979.C13737

Martinez, P. A., Barker, M., Struck, A., Castro, L. J., Erdmann, C., Garijo, D., Gesing, S., Loewe, A., & Moldón, J. (2022). A Survey on Adoption Guidelines for the FAIR4RS Principles. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6374598

Martinez, P. A., Struck, A., Castro, L. J., Garijo, D., Loewe, A., Gesing, S., Barker, M., Chue Hong, N., Erdmann, C., Martinez-Ortiz, C., & Sansone, S.-A. (2022, March). A Survey on Adoption Guidelines for the FAIR4RS Principles: Dataset [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6375540

Martinez-Ortiz, C., Katz, D. S., Lamprecht, A.-L., Barker, M., Loewe, A., Fouilloux, A., Wyngaard, J., Garijo, D., Moldon, J., Castro, L. J., Wheeler, D., Albers, J. R. D., & Lee, A. (2022). FAIR4RS: Adoption support. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6258366

Martinez-Ortiz, C., Martinez Lavanchy, P., Sesink, L., Olivier, B. G., Meakin, J., de Jong, M., & Cruz, M. (2022). Practical guide to Software Management Plans. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7248877

Samuel, S., & Mietchen, D. (2022). Computational reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks from biomedical publications.

Anzt, H., Bach, F., Druskat, S., Löffler, F., Loewe, A., Renard, B. Y., Seemann, G., Struck, A., Achhammer, E., Aggarwal, P., Appel, F., Bader, M., Brusch, L., Busse, C., Chourdakis, G., Dabrowski, P. W., Ebert, P., Flemisch, B., Friedl, S., et al. (2021). An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research, 9, 295. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23224.2

Arvanitou, E.-M., Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., & Carver, J. C. (2021). Software engineering practices for scientific software development: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Systems and Software, 172, 110848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110848

Chue Hong, N. P., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Lamprecht, A.-L., Martinez, C., Psomopoulos, F. E., Harrow, J., Castro, L. J., Gruenpeter, M., Martinez, P. A., & Honeyman, T. (2021). FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles). https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068

Chue Hong, N. P., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Lamprecht, A.-L., Martinez, C., Psomopoulos, F. E., Harrow, J., Castro, L. J., Gruenpeter, M., Martinez, P. A., & Honeyman, T. (2021). FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles). https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068

Chue Hong, N. P., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Lamprecht, A.-L., Martinez, C., Psomopoulos, F. E., Harrow, J., Castro, L. J., Gruenpeter, M., Martinez, P. A., & Honeyman, T. (2021). FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles). https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068

Cimiano, P., Pietsch, C., & Wiljes, C. (2021). Studies in Analytical Reproducibility: the Conquaire Project (p. 8057464 bytes). https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/2942780

Gruenpeter, M., Katz, D. S., Lamprecht, A.-L., Honeyman, T., Garijo, D., Struck, A., Niehues, A., Martinez, P. A., Castro, L. J., Rabemanantsoa, T., Chue Hong, N. P., Martinez-Ortiz, C., Sesink, L., Liffers, M., Fouilloux, A. C., Erdmann, C., Peroni, S., Martinez Lavanchy, P., Todorov, I., & Sinha, M. (2021). Defining Research Software: a controversial discussion. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5504016

Gruenpeter, M., Katz, D. S., Lamprecht, A.-L., Honeyman, T., Garijo, D., Struck, A., Niehues, A., Martinez, P. A., Castro, L. J., Rabemanantsoa, T., Chue Hong, N. P., Martinez-Ortiz, C., Sesink, L., Liffers, M., Fouilloux, A. C., Erdmann, C., Peroni, S., Martinez Lavanchy, P., Todorov, I., & Sinha, M. (2021). Defining Research Software: a controversial discussion. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5504016

Katz, D. S., Gruenpeter, M., & Honeyman, T. (2021). Taking a fresh look at FAIR for research software. Patterns, 2, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100222

Koch, T., Gläser, D., Weishaupt, K., Ackermann, S., Beck, M., Becker, B., Burbulla, S., Class, H., Coltman, E., Emmert, S., Fetzer, T., Grüninger, C., Heck, K., Hommel, J., Kurz, T., Lipp, M., Mohammadi, F., Scherrer, S., Schneider, M., et al. (2021). DuMux 3 – an open-source simulator for solving flow and transport problems in porous media with a focus on model coupling. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 81, 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.012

Lee, G., Bacon, S., Bush, I., Fortunato, L., Gavaghan, D., Lestang, T., Morton, C., Robinson, M., Rocca-Serra, P., Sansone, S.-A., & Webb, H. (2021). Barely sufficient practices in scientific computing. Patterns, 2, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100206

Lee, G., Bacon, S., Bush, I., Fortunato, L., Gavaghan, D., Lestang, T., Morton, C., Robinson, M., Rocca-Serra, P., Sansone, S.-A., & Webb, H. (2021). Barely sufficient practices in scientific computing. Patterns, 2, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100206

van Aalst, M., Ebenhoeh, O., & Matuszynska, A. (2021). Constructing and analysing dynamic models with modelbase v1.2.3: a software update. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 22, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04122-7

Alliez, P., Cosmo, R. D., Guedj, B., Girault, A., Hacid, M.-S., Legrand, A., & Rougier, N. (2020). Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook From Inria. Computing in Science Engineering, 22, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2949413

Anzt, H., Bach, F., Druskat, S., Löffler, F., Loewe, A., Renard, B. Y., Seemann, G., Struck, A., Achhammer, E., Aggarwal, P., Appel, F., Bader, M., Brusch, L., Busse, C., Chourdakis, G., Dabrowski, P. W., Ebert, P., Flemisch, B., Friedl, S., et al. (2020). An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research, 9, 295. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23224.1

Anzt, H., Bach, F., Druskat, S., Löffler, F., Loewe, A., Renard, B. Y., Seemann, G., Struck, A., Achhammer, E., Aggarwal, P., Appel, F., Bader, M., Brusch, L., Busse, C., Chourdakis, G., Dabrowski, P. W., Ebert, P., Flemisch, B., Friedl, S., et al. (2020). An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research, 9, 295. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23224.1

Anzt, H., Bach, F., Druskat, S., Löffler, F., Loewe, A., Renard, B. Y., Seemann, G., Struck, A., Achhammer, E., Aggarwal, P., Appel, F., Bader, M., Brusch, L., Busse, C., Chourdakis, G., Dabrowski, P. W., Ebert, P., Flemisch, B., Friedl, S., et al. (2020). An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research, 9, 295. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23224.1

Commission, E., for Research, D.-G., & Innovation. (2020). Scholarly infrastructures for research software : report from the EOSC Executive Board Working Group (WG) Architecture Task Force (TF) SIRS. Publications Office. https://doi.org/doi/10.2777/28598

Cosmo, R. D., Gruenpeter, M., Marmol, B., Monteil, A., Romary, L., & Sadowska, J. (2020). Curated Archiving of Research Software Artifacts: Lessons Learned from the French Open Archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation, 15, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.698

Cosmo, R. D., Gruenpeter, M., Marmol, B., Monteil, A., Romary, L., & Sadowska, J. (2020). Curated Archiving of Research Software Artifacts: Lessons Learned from the French Open Archive (HAL). International Journal of Digital Curation, 15, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.698

Flemisch, B., Hermann, S., Holm, C., Mehl, M., Reina, G., Uekermann, B., Boehringer, D., Ertl, T., Grad, J.-N., Iglezakis, D., Jaust, A., Koch, T., Seeland, A., Weeber, R., Weik, F., & Weishaupt, K. (2020). Umgang mit Forschungssoftware an der Universität Stuttgart. Universität Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/OPUS-11178

Flemisch, B., Hermann, S., Holm, C., Mehl, M., Reina, G., Uekermann, B., Boehringer, D., Ertl, T., Grad, J.-N., Iglezakis, D., Jaust, A., Koch, T., Seeland, A., Weeber, R., Weik, F., & Weishaupt, K. (2020). Umgang mit Forschungssoftware an der Universität Stuttgart. Universität Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.18419/OPUS-11178

Hasselbring, W., Carr, L., Hettrick, S., Packer, H., & Tiropanis, T. (2020). Open Source Research Software. Computer, 53, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.2998235

Hermann, S., Schneider, M., Flemisch, B., Frey, S., Iglezakis, D., Ruf, M., Schembera, B., Seeland, A., & Steeb, H. (2020). Datenmanagement im SFB 1313. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, 1. https://doi.org/10.17192/BFDM.2020.1.8085

Magaña, P., Del-Rosal-Salido, J., Cobos, M., Lira-Loarca, A., & Ortega-Sánchez, M. (2020). Approaching Software Engineering for Marine Sciences: A Single Development Process for Multiple End-User Applications. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8050350

Pianosi, F., Sarrazin, F., & Wagener, T. (2020). How successfully is open-source research software adopted? Results and implications of surveying the users of a sensitivity analysis toolbox. Environmental Modelling & Software, 124, 104579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104579

Ruiz-Rube, I., Person, T., Dodero, J. M., Mota, J. M., & Sánchez-Jara, J. M. (2020). Applying static code analysis for domain-specific languages. Software and Systems Modeling, 19, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-019-00729-w

SIRS, E. E. B. W. G. (. A. T. F. (. (2020). Scholarly infrastructures for research software (E. Commission, Ed.). European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/s/oMEw

Trisovic, A., Durbin, P., Schlatter, T., Durand, G., Barbosa, S., Brooke, D., & Crosas, M. (2020). Advancing computational reproducibility in the Dataverse data repository platform. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02985

Akhmerov, A., Cruz, M., Drost, N., Hof, C., Knapen, T., Kuzak, M., Martinez-Ortiz, C., der Velden, Y. T.-v., & van Werkhoven, B. (2019). Raising the Profile of Research Software: Recommendations for Funding Agencies and Research Institutions (NWO, Ed.).

Ballhausen, M. (2019). Free and Open Source Software Licenses Explained. IEEE Computer, 52, Article 6. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/computer/computer52.html#Ballhausen19

Druskat, S., Spaaks, J. H., Chue Hong, N., Haines, R., & Baker, J. (2019). Citation File Format (CFF) - Specifications. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515946

Erdmann, C., Simons, N., Otsuji, R., Labou, S., Johnson, R., Castelao, G., Boas, B. V., Lamprecht, A.-L., Ortiz, C. M., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, P. A., Stokes, L., Honeyman, T., Wise, S., Quan, J., Peterson, S., Neeser, A., Karvovskaya, L., et al. (2019). Top 10 FAIR Data & Software Things. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2555498

Fehr, J., Himpe, C., Rave, S., & Saak, J. (2019). Sustainable Research Software Hand-Over. CoRR, abs/1909.09469. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1909.html#abs-1909-09469

Fehr, J., Himpe, C., Rave, S., & Saak, J. (2019). Sustainable Research Software Hand-Over. CoRR, abs/1909.09469. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1909.html#abs-1909-09469

Gomez-Diaz, T., & Recio, T. (2019). On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure. F1000Research, 8, 1353. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19994.2

Gärtner, M. (2019). RePlay-DH Client v1.3.0. https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-475

Hasselbring, W., Carr, L., Hettrick, S., Packer, H., & Tiropanis, T. (2019). FAIR and Open Computer Science Research Software. In arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05986. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1908.html#abs-1908-05986

Hermann, S., Iglezakis, D., & Seeland, A. (2019). Requirements for Finding Research Data and Software. Pamm, 19, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201900480

Hermann, S., Iglezakis, D., & Seeland, A. (2019). Requirements for Finding Research Data and Software. Pamm, 19, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201900480

Hsu, L., Hutchison, V. B., & Langseth, M. L. (2019). Measuring sustainability of seed-funded earth science informatics projects. Plos One, 14, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222807

Johanson, A. N., & Hasselbring, W. (2019). Software Engineering for Computational Science. In S. Becker, I. Bogicevic, G. Herzwurm, & S. Wagner (Eds.), SE/SWM: Vol. P-292 (pp. 43–44). GI. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/se/se2019.html#JohansonH19

Lamprecht, A.-L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, C., Arcila, R., Pico, E. M. D., Angel, V. D. D., van de Sandt, S., Ison, J., Martinez, P. A., McQuilton, P., Valencia, A., Harrow, J., Psomopoulos, F., Gelpi, J. Ll., Hong, N. C., Goble, C., & Capella-Gutierrez, S. (2019). Towards FAIR principles for~research~software. Data Science, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3233/ds-190026

Lamprecht, A.-L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, C., Arcila, R., Pico, E. M. D., Angel, V. D. D., van de Sandt, S., Ison, J., Martinez, P. A., McQuilton, P., Valencia, A., Harrow, J., Psomopoulos, F., Gelpi, J. Ll., Hong, N. C., Goble, C., & Capella-Gutierrez, S. (2019). Towards FAIR principles for~research~software. Data Science, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3233/ds-190026

Li, K., Chen, P.-Y., & Yan, E. (2019). Challenges of measuring software impact through citations: An examination of the lme4 R package. Journal of Informetrics, 13, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.007

Scheliga, K., Pampel, H., Konrad, U., Fritzsch, B., Schlauch, T., Nolden, M., Zu Castell, W., Finke, A., Hammitzsch, M., Bertuch, O., & Denker, M. (2019). Dealing with research software: Recommendations for best practices. https://doi.org/10.2312/OS.HELMHOLTZ.003

Siepel, A. (2019). Challenges in funding and developing genomic software: roots and remedies. Genome Biology, 20, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1763-7

Task Group Forschungssoftware Des Arbeitskreises Open Science Der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft. (2019). Muster-Richtlinie Nachhaltige Forschungssoftware an den Helmholtz-Zentren. https://doi.org/10.2312/OS.HELMHOLTZ.007

van de Sandt, S., Nielsen, L. H., Ioannidis, A., Muench, A., Henneken, E. A., Accomazzi, A., Bigarella, C., Lopez, J. B. G., & Dallmeier-Tiessen, S. (2019). Practice meets Principle: Tracking Software and Data Citations to Zenodo DOIs. CoRR, abs/1911.00295. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/corr/corr1911.html#abs-1911-00295

VSNU, NFU, KNAW, NWO and ZonMw. (2019). Room for everyone’s talent.

AlNoamany, Y., & Borghi, J. A. (2018). Towards computational reproducibility: researcher perspectives on the use and sharing of software. PeerJ Computer Science, 4, e163. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.163

Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018). Software Deposit and Preservation Policy and Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310

Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018). Software Deposit And Preservation Policy And Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310

Cruz, M. J., Kurapati, S., & Turkyilmaz-van der Velden, Y. (2018). The Role of Data Stewardship in Software Sustainability and Reproducibility. 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on E-Science (E-Science), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2018.00009

Gundersen, O. E., & Kjensmo, S. (2018). State of the Art: Reproducibility in Artificial Intelligence. In S. McIlraith & K. Weinberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age: 27th International Conference, GSCL 2017, Berlin, Germany, September 13-14, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 284–291). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_24

Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age (pp. 284–291). Springer International Publishing.

Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age (pp. 284–291). Springer International Publishing.

Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018). Supporting Sustainable Process Documentation. In G. Rehm & T. Declerck (Eds.), Language Technologies for the Challenges of the Digital Age: 27th International Conference, GSCL 2017, Berlin, Germany, September 13-14, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 284–291). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73706-5_24

Hallé, S., Khoury, R., & Awesso, M. (2018). Streamlining the Inclusion of Computer Experiments In a Research Paper. IEEE Computer, 51, Article 11. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/computer/computer51.html#HalleKA18

Hermann, S., Hahn, U., Gärtner, M., & Fritze, F. (2018). Nachträglich ist nicht gleich nachnutzbar: Ansätze für integrierte Prozessdokumentation im Forschungsalltag. O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal, 5, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5282/O-BIB/2018H3S32-45

Hermann, S., Hahn, U., Gärtner, M., & Fritze, F. (2018). Nachträglich ist nicht gleich nachnutzbar: Ansätze für integrierte Prozessdokumentation im Forschungsalltag. O-Bib. Das Offene Bibliotheksjournal, 5, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5282/O-BIB/2018H3S32-45

Hermann, S., Hahn, U., Gärtner, M., & Fritze, F. (2018). Nachträglich ist nicht gleich nachnutzbar: Ansätze für integrierte Prozessdokumentation im Forschungsalltag: 32-45 Seiten / o-bib. Das offene Bibliotheksjournal / herausgegeben vom VDB, Bd. 5 Nr. 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5282/O-BIB/2018H3S32-45

Hinsen, K. (2018). Verifiability in computer-aided research: the role of digital scientific notations at the human-computer interface. PeerJ Computer Science, 4, e158. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.158

Johanson, A., & Hasselbring, W. (2018). Software Engineering for Computational Science: Past, Present, Future. Computing in Science Engineering, 20, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2018.021651343

Karimzadeh, M., & Hoffman, M. M. (2018). Top considerations for creating bioinformatics software documentation. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 19, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbw134

Katerbow, M., & Feulner, G. (2018). Handreichung zum Umgang mit Forschungssoftware. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1172970

Katerbow, M., & Feulner, G. (2018). Handreichung Zum Umgang Mit Forschungssoftware. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1172970

Katz, D. S., & Hong, N. P. C. (2018). Software Citation in Theory and Practice. In J. H. Davenport, M. Kauers, G. Labahn, & J. Urban (Eds.), ICMS (Vol. 10931, pp. 289–296). Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icms/icms2018.html#KatzH18

Kuzak, M., Harrow, J., Jimenez, R. C., Martinez, P. A., Psomopoulos, F. E., Svobodová Vařeková, R., & Via, A. (2018). Lesson Development for Open Source Software Best Practices Adoption. 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on E-Science (E-Science), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2018.00011

Lee, B. D. (2018). Ten simple rules for documenting scientific software. PLOS Computational Biology, 14, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006561

no author. (2018, February 15). Choose an open source license | Choose a License. https://choosealicense.com/

Russell, P. H., Johnson, R. L., Ananthan, S., Harnke, B., & Carlson, N. E. (2018). A large-scale analysis of bioinformatics code on GitHub. Plos One, 13, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205898

Rüde, U., Willcox, K., McInnes, L. C., & Sterck, H. D. (2018). Research and Education in Computational Science and Engineering. SIAM Review, 60, Article 3. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/siamrev/siamrev60.html#RudeWMS18

Schlauch, T., Meinel, M., & Haupt, C. (2018). DLR Software Engineering Guidelines. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1344612

Allen, A., Aragon, C. R., Becker, C., Carver, J., Chis, A., Combemale, B., Croucher, M., Crowston, K., Garijo, D., Gehani, A., Goble, C. A., Haines, R., Hirschfeld, R., Howison, J., Huff, K. D., Jay, C., Katz, D. S., Kirchner, C., Kuksenok, K., et al. (2017). Engineering Academic Software (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 16252). Dagstuhl Manifestos, 6, Article 1. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/dagstuhl-manifestos/dagstuhl-manifestos6.html#AllenABCCCCCGGG17

Atkinson, M., Gesing, S., Montagnat, J., & Taylor, I. (2017). Scientific workflows: Past, present and future. Future Generation Computer Systems, 75, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.05.041

Bar-Sinai, M., & Dunlap, M. (2017). The Open Monolith - Keeping Your Codebase (and Your Headaches) Small.

Bieliauskas, S., & Schreiber, A. (2017, April). DLR-SC/prov-comics: QS PROV Comics Prototype - Big fixes [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.555927

Boettiger, C. (2017). Generating CodeMeta Metadata for R Packages. The Journal of Open Source Software, 2, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00454

Childers, B. R., & Chrysanthis, P. K. (2017). Artifact Evaluation: Is It a Real Incentive? 2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on E-Science (E-Science), 488–489. https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2017.79

Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., & Pinfield, S. (2017). Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23781

Donaldson, D. R., Martin, S., & Proffen, T. (2017). Understanding Perspectives on Sharing Neutron Data at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Data Science Journal, 16, 35. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-035

Einbock, J. (2017). Informationsbeschaffungs- und Publikationsverhalten von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern der natur- und ingenieurwissenschaftlichen Fächer.

Joo, Y. K., & Kim, Y. (2017). Engineering researchers’ data reuse behaviours: a structural equation modelling approach. The Electronic Library, 35, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2016-0163

Feldsien-Sudhaus, I., & Rajski, B. (2016). Digitale Forschungsdaten für die Zukunft sichern: Umfrage zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten an der TU Hamburg: Auswertung. https://tubdok.tub.tuhh.de/handle/11420/1329

Hauck, Dr. R., Kaps, R., Krojanski, H. G., Meyer, A., Neumann, J., & Soßna, V. (2016). Der Umgang mit Forschungsdaten an der Leibniz Universität Hannover. Auswertung einer Umfrage und ergänzender Interviews 2015/16 (p. –). Leibniz Universität Hannover. https://doi.org/10.15488/265

Van den Eynden, V., Knight, G., Vlad, A., Radler, B., Tenopir, C., Leon, D., Manista, F., Whitworth, J., & Corti, L. (2016). Survey of Wellcome researchers and their attitudes to open research (figshare, Ed.). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4055448.v1

Bauer, B., Ferus, A., Gorraiz, J., Gründhammer, V., Gumpenberger, C., Maly, N., Mühlegger, J. M., Preza, J. L., Sánchez Solís, B., Schmidt, N., & Steineder, C. (2015). Forschende und ihre Daten: Ergebnisse einer österreichweiten Befragung. Report 2015 – Executive Summary und Empfehlungen.

Swauger, S., & Vision, T. J. (2015). What Factors Influence Where Researchers Deposit their Data? A Survey of Researchers Submitting to Data Repositories. (No. 1). 10, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.289

Tenopir, C., Dalton, E. D., Allard, S., Frame, M., Pjesivac, I., Birch, B., Pollock, D., & Dorsett, K. (2015). Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide. Plos One, 10, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134826

Tristram, F., & Streit, A. (2015). Daten zu bwFDM-Communities. http://bwfdm.scc.kit.edu/cgi-bin/daten/

Tristram, F., & Streit, A. (2015). Öffentlicher Abschlussbericht von bwFDM-Communities. Karlsruher Institut für Technologie.

Stodden, V. (2010). The Scientific Method in Practice: Reproducibility in the Computational Sciences (M. S. R. P. No. 4773-10, Ed.; No. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4773-10). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1550193

Garbuglia, F., Saenen, B., Gaillard, V., & Engelhardt, C. (2021). D7.5 Good Practices in FAIR Competence Education. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5785253

Kümmet, S., Lücke, S., Schulz, J., Spenger, M., & Weber, T. (2019). DataCite Best Practice Guide. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3559799

Ostendorff, P., & Linke, D. (2019). Best-Practices im Umgang mit rechtlichen Fragestellungen zum Forschungsdatenmanagement (FDM). Bibliotheksdienst, 53, Article 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/bd-2019-0098

Austin, C. C., Bloom, T., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Khodiyar, V. K., Murphy, F., Nurnberger, A., Raymond, L., Stockhause, M., Tedds, J., Vardigan, M., & Whyte, A. (2017). Key components of data publishing: using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0178-2

Fehr, J., and Jan Heiland, Himpe, C., & Saak, J. (2016). Best practices for replicability, reproducibility and reusability of computer-based experiments exemplified by model reduction software. AIMS Mathematics, 1, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2016.3.261

Schembera, B., & Iglezakis, D. (n.d.). The Genesis of EngMeta - A Metadata Model for Research Data in Computational Engineering. In Metadata and Semantic Research. 12th International Conference, MTSR 2018, Limassol, Cyprus, 23-26 October 2018, Proceedings. Springer.

Baum, R. (2025). Einführung in Terminologien und Terminologiedienste. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14938279

Fritze, F., Selent, B., Weinspach, K., Roy, S., & Iglezakis, D. (2025). Efficient Data Curation by Automating Workflows. In P. Kling (Ed.), E-Science-Tage 2025 Research Data Management: Challenges in a Changing World.

Gustafsson, O. J. R., Wilkinson, S. R., Bacall, F., Soiland-Reyes, S., Leo, S., Pireddu, L., Owen, S., Juty, N., Fernández, J. M., Brown, T., Ménager, H., Grüning, B., Capella-Gutierrez, S., Coppens, F., & Goble, C. (2025). WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows. Scientific Data, 12, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04786-3

Bayerlein, B., Schilling, M., Birkholz, H., Jung, M., Waitelonis, J., Mädler, L., & Sack, H. (2024). PMD Core Ontology: Achieving semantic interoperability in materials science. Materials & Design, 237, 112603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112603

Bayerlein, B., Schilling, M., Birkholz, H., Jung, M., Waitelonis, J., Mädler, L., & Sack, H. (2024). PMD Core Ontology: Achieving semantic interoperability in materials science. Materials & Design, 237, 112603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112603

Castro, L. J., Ferenz, S., Hajiabadi, H., Kuckertz, P., Löbe, M., Schmidt, C., Struck, A., & Thiery, F. (2024). Results on a Survey on Research Software Metadata in the NFDI Consortia. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12704414

David, M., Colom, M., Garijo, D., Castro, L. J., Louvet, V., Ronchieri, E., Torquati, M., del Caño, L., Cerlane, L., Van den Bossche, M., Campos, I., & Di Cosmo, R. (2024). Ensure Software Quality. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723608

David, M., Colom, M., Garijo, D., Castro, L. J., Louvet, V., Ronchieri, E., Torquati, M., del Caño, L., Cerlane, L., Van den Bossche, M., Campos, I., & Di Cosmo, R. (2024). Ensure Software Quality. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723608

Gregory, A., Bell, D., Brickley, D., Buttigieg, P. L., Cox, S., Edwards, M., Doug, F., Gonzalez Morales, L. G., Heus, P., Hodson, S., Kanjala, C., Le Franc, Y., Maxwell, L., Molloy, L., Richard, S., Rizzolo, F., Winstanley, P., Wyborn, L., & Burton, A. (2024). WorldFAIR (D2.3) Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) (Report Synthesising Recommendations for Disciplines and Cross-Disciplinary Research Areas). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11236871

Gregory, A., Bell, D., Brickley, D., Buttigieg, P. L., Cox, S., Edwards, M., Doug, F., Gonzalez Morales, L. G., Heus, P., Hodson, S., Kanjala, C., Le Franc, Y., Maxwell, L., Molloy, L., Richard, S., Rizzolo, F., Winstanley, P., Wyborn, L., & Burton, A. (2024). WorldFAIR (D2.3) Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) (Report Synthesising Recommendations for Disciplines and Cross-Disciplinary Research Areas). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11236871

Gregory, A., Bell, D., Brickley, D., Buttigieg, P. L., Cox, S., Edwards, M., Doug, F., Gonzalez Morales, L. G., Heus, P., Hodson, S., Kanjala, C., Le Franc, Y., Maxwell, L., Molloy, L., Richard, S., Rizzolo, F., Winstanley, P., Wyborn, L., & Burton, A. (2024). WorldFAIR (D2.3) Cross-Domain Interoperability Framework (CDIF) (Report Synthesising Recommendations for Disciplines and Cross-Disciplinary Research Areas). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11236871

Karras, O., Budde, L., Merkel, P., Hermsdorf, J., Stonis, M., Overmeyer, L., Behrens, B.-A., & Auer, S. (2024). Organizing Scientific Knowledge from Engineering Sciences Using the Open Research Knowledge Graph: The Tailored Forming Process Chain Use Case. Data Science Journal, 23. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-052

Lin, K., Alrashed, T., & Noy, N. (2024). Relationships are Complicated! An Analysis of Relationships Between Datasets on the Web. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14636

Lin, K., Alrashed, T., & Noy, N. (2024). Relationships are Complicated! An Analysis of Relationships Between Datasets on the Web. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14636

Masmoudi, M., Ben Abdallah Ben Lamine, S., Karray, M. H., Archimede, B., & Baazaoui Zghal, H. (2024). Semantic Data Integration and Querying: A Survey and Challenges. ACM Comput. Surv., 56, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3653317

Behr, A. S., Völkenrath, M., & Kockmann, N. (2023). Ontology Extension with NLP-based Concept Extraction for Domain Experts in Catalytic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2457909/v1

Buys, M. (2023). DataCite Looking Ahead – Global Data Citation Corpus for All Data Citations [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7634709

Buys, M. (2023). DataCite Looking Ahead – Global Data Citation Corpus for All Data Citations [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7634709

Felderer, M., Goedicke, M., Grunske, L., Hasselbring, W., Lamprecht, A.-L., & Rumpe, B. (2023). Toward Research Software Engineering Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8020525

Groth, P., Simperl, E., van Erp, M., & Vrandečić, D. (2023). Knowledge Graphs and their Role in the Knowledge Engineering of the 21st Century (Dagstuhl Seminar 22372). https://doi.org/10.4230/DAGREP.12.9.60

Gruenpeter, M., Granger, S., Monteil, A., Chue Hong, N., Breitmoser, E., Antonioletti, M., Garijo, D., González Guardia, E., Gonzalez Beltran, A., Goble, C., Soiland-Reyes, S., Juty, N., & Mejias, G. (2023). D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8097537

Gruenpeter, M., Granger, S., Monteil, A., Chue Hong, N., Breitmoser, E., Antonioletti, M., Garijo, D., González Guardia, E., Gonzalez Beltran, A., Goble, C., Soiland-Reyes, S., Juty, N., & Mejias, G. (2023). D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8097537

Gruenpeter, M., Granger, S., Monteil, A., Chue Hong, N., Breitmoser, E., Antonioletti, M., Garijo, D., González Guardia, E., Gonzalez Beltran, A., Goble, C., Soiland-Reyes, S., Juty, N., & Mejias, G. (2023). D4.4 - Guidelines for recommended metadata standard for research software within EOSC. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8097537

Lauterbach, S., Dienhart, H., Range, J., Malzacher, S., Spöring, J.-D., Rother, D., Pinto, M. F., Martins, P., Lagerman, C. E., Bommarius, A. S., Høst, A. V., Woodley, J. M., Ngubane, S., Kudanga, T., Bergmann, F. T., Rohwer, J. M., Iglezakis, D., Weidemann, A., Wittig, U., et al. (2023). EnzymeML: seamless data flow and modeling of enzymatic data. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01763-1

Lauterbach, S., Dienhart, H., Range, J., Malzacher, S., Spöring, J.-D., Rother, D., Pinto, M. F., Martins, P., Lagerman, C. E., Bommarius, A. S., Høst, A. V., Woodley, J. M., Ngubane, S., Kudanga, T., Bergmann, F. T., Rohwer, J. M., Iglezakis, D., Weidemann, A., Wittig, U., et al. (2023). EnzymeML: seamless data flow and modeling of enzymatic data. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01763-1

Quarati, A. (2023). Open Government Data: Usage trends and metadata quality. Journal of Information Science, 49, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211027775

Stathis, K., Ross, C., Dreyer, B., & Vierkant, P. (2023). DataCite Metadata Schema 4.4 to Schema.org Mapping (DataCite, Ed.). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7661399

Wu, M., Richard, S. M., Verhey, C., Castro, L. J., Cecconi, B., & Juty, N. (2023). An Analysis of Crosswalks from Research Data Schemas to Schema.org. Data Intelligence, 5, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00186

Wu, M., Richard, S. M., Verhey, C., Castro, L. J., Cecconi, B., & Juty, N. (2023). An Analysis of Crosswalks from Research Data Schemas to Schema.org. Data Intelligence, 5, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00186

Arndt, S., Farnbacher, B., Fuhrmans, M., Hachinger, S., Hickmann, J., Hoppe, N., Horsch, M. T., Iglezakis, D., Karmacharya, A., Lanza, G., Leimer, S., Munke, J., Terzijska, D., Theissen-Lipp, J., Wiljes, C., & Windeck, J. (2022). Metadata4Ing: An ontology for describing the generation of research data within a scientific activity. (Zenodo, Ed.). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5957104

Doorn, P., Steinhoff, W., Verburg, M., Grootveld, M., & Dillo, I. (2022). F-UJI and FAIR Enough tool comparison dataset (European Research Data Landscape study) [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7371409

Druskat, S., Bertuch, O., Juckeland, G., Knodel, O., & Schlauch, T. (2022). Software publications with rich metadata: state of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept.

Druskat, S., Bertuch, O., Juckeland, G., Knodel, O., & Schlauch, T. (2022). Software publications with rich metadata: state of the art, automated workflows and HERMES concept.

Hirsch, M., Iglezakis, D., Leymann, F., & Zimmermann, M. (2022). The ReSUS Project - Infrastructure for Sharing Research Software. In E-Science-Tage 2021: Share Your Research Data (pp. 267–276). heiBOOKS. https://doi.org/10.11588/HEIBOOKS.979.C13737

Quarati, A., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2022). Do researchers use open research data? Exploring the relationships between usage trends and metadata quality across scientific disciplines from the Figshare case. Journal of Information Science, 48, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520961048

Anzt, H., Bach, F., Druskat, S., Löffler, F., Loewe, A., Renard, B. Y., Seemann, G., Struck, A., Achhammer, E., Aggarwal, P., Appel, F., Bader, M., Brusch, L., Busse, C., Chourdakis, G., Dabrowski, P. W., Ebert, P., Flemisch, B., Friedl, S., et al. (2021). An environment for sustainable research software in Germany and beyond: current state, open challenges, and call for action. F1000Research, 9, 295. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23224.2

de Vries, J., Tykhonov, V., Scharnhorst, A., Indarto, E., & Admiraal, F. (2021). Flexible metadata schemes for research data repositories - The Common Framework in Dataverse and the CMDI use case. In M. Monachini & M. Eskevich (Eds.), Proceedings of the CLARIN Annual Conference 2021 (pp. 109–118).

Horsch, M. T., Morgado, J. F., Goldbeck, G., Iglezakis, D., Konchakova, N. A., & Schembera, B. (2021). Domain-specific metadata standardization in materials modelling. Domain Ontologies for Research Data Management in Industry Commons of Materials and Manufacturing. https://openreview.net/forum?id=uYgdGd7_wgH

Iglezakis, D., Fuhrmans, M., Arndt, S., Demandt, É., Hachinger, S., Hausen, D., Lanza, G., Lipp, J., Stotzka, R., & Terzijska, D. (2021). Interoperabilität von Metadaten innerhalb der NFDI: Konsortienübergreifender Metadaten-Workshop am 2./3. Juli 2020. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2021.2.8313

Iglezakis, D., Fuhrmans, M., Arndt, S., Demandt, É., Hachinger, S., Hausen, D., Lanza, G., Lipp, J., Stotzka, R., & Terzijska, D. (2021). Interoperabilität von Metadaten innerhalb der NFDI: Konsortienübergreifender Metadaten-Workshop am 2./3. Juli 2020. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2021.2.8313

Löffler, F., Wesp, V., König-Ries, B., & Klan, F. (2021). Dataset search in biodiversity research: Do metadata in data repositories reflect scholarly information needs? Plos One, 16, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246099

Schembera, B. (2021). Like a rainbow in the dark: metadata annotation for HPC applications in the age of dark data. The Journal of Supercomputing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03602-6

Wu, M., Juty, N., Research Metadata Schemas WG, R., Collins, J., Duerr, R., Ridsdale, C., Shepherd, A., Verhey, C., & Jael Castro, L. (2021). Guidelines for publishing structured metadata on the web (R. D. Alliance, Ed.). https://www.rd-alliance.org/system/files/documents/Guidelines%20for%20publishing%20structured%20data_V3.0_20210615.pdf

Biernacka, K. (2020). LEGO® Metadaten für die Reproduzierbarkeit. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3733164

Heinrichs, B., & Politze, M. (2020). Moving towards a General Metadata Extraction Solution for Research Data with State-of-the-Art Methods. Kdir, 227–234.

Hermann, S., Schneider, M., Flemisch, B., Frey, S., Iglezakis, D., Ruf, M., Schembera, B., Seeland, A., & Steeb, H. (2020). Datenmanagement im SFB 1313. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2020.1.8085

Hermann, S., Schneider, M., Flemisch, B., Frey, S., Iglezakis, D., Ruf, M., Schembera, B., Seeland, A., & Steeb, H. (2020). Datenmanagement im SFB 1313. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2020.1.8085

Hub, T. C. I. (2020). A survey of Top-Level Ontologies.

Hugo, W., Le Franc, Y., Coen, G., Parland-von Essen, J., & Bonino, L. (2020). D2.5 FAIR Semantics Recommendations Second Iteration. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4314321

Kesper, A., Wenz, V., & Taentzer, G. (2020). Detecting Quality Problems in Research Data: A Model-Driven Approach. http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11298

Schembera, B., & Iglezakis, D. (2020). EngMeta - Metadata for Computational Engineering. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 14, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2020.107792

Selent, B., Kraus, H., Hansen, N., Schembera, B., Seeland, A., & Iglezakis, D. (2020). Management of Research Data in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics. In V. Heuveline, F. Gebhart, & N. Mohammadianbisheh (Eds.), E-Science-Tage 2019: Data to Knowledge (pp. 128–139). HeiBOOKS. https://doi.org/10.11588/heibooks.598

Grunzke, R., Hartmann, V., Jejkal, T., Kollai, H., Prabhune, A., Herold, H., Deicke, A., Dressler, C., Dolhoff, J., Stanek, J., Hoffmann, A., Müller-Pfefferkorn, R., Schrade, T., Meinel, G., Herres-Pawlis, S., & Nagel, W. E. (2019). The MASi repository service — Comprehensive, metadata-driven and multi-community research data management. Future Generation Computer Systems, 94, 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.12.023

Horsch, M. T., Niethammer, C., Boccardo, G., Carbone, P., Chiacchiera, S., Chiricotto, M., Elliott, J. D., Lobaskin, V., Neumann, P., Schiffels, P., Seaton, M. A., Todorov, I. T., Vrabec, J., & Cavalcanti, W. L. (2019). Semantic Interoperability and Characterization of Data Provenance in Computational Molecular Engineering. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 65, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.9b00739

Iglezakis, D., & Schembera, B. (2019). EngMeta - a Metadata Scheme for the Engineering Sciences [DaRUS]. https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-500

Iglezakis, D. (2019). Relevance of Different Metadata Fields for the Description of Research Data from the Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18419/darus-501

Kümmet, S., Lücke, S., Schulz, J., Spenger, M., & Weber, T. (2019). DataCite Best Practice Guide. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3559799

Schembera, B., & Iglezakis, D. (2019). The Genesis of EngMeta - A Metadata Model for Research Data in Computational Engineering. In E. Garoufallou, F. Sartori, R. Siatri, & M. Zervas (Eds.), Metadata and Semantic Research (No. 846; pp. 127–132). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_12

Schembera, B., & Iglezakis, D. (2019). The Genesis of EngMeta - A Metadata Model for Research Data in Computational Engineering. In E. Garoufallou, F. Sartori, R. Siatri, & M. Zervas (Eds.), Metadata and Semantic Research (No. 846; pp. 127–132). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_12

Selent, B., Schembera, B., Iglezakis, D., & Seeland, A. (2019). Datenmanagement in Infrastrukturen, Prozessen und Lebenszyklen für die Ingenieurwissenschaften : Abschlussbericht des BMBF-Projektes Dipl-Ing. Universität Stuttgart; https://doi.org/10.2314/KXP:1693393980

Sprenger, J., Zehl, L., Pick, J., Sonntag, M., Grewe, J., Wachtler, T., Grün, S., & Denker, M. (2019). odMLtables: A User-Friendly Approach for Managing Metadata of Neurophysiological Experiments. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/69215/

Balatsoukas, P., Rousidis, D., & Garoufallou, E. (2018). A method for examining metadata quality in open research datasets using the OAI-PMH and SQL queries: the case of the Dublin Core ‘Subject’ element and suggestions for user-centred metadata annotation design. Ijmso, 13, Article 1. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ijmso/ijmso13.html#BalatsoukasRG18

Brown, C., Hong, N. C., & Jackson, M. (2018). Software Deposit And Preservation Policy And Planning Workshop Report. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1250310

Fowler, D., Barratt, J., & Walsh, P. (2018). Frictionless Data: Making Research Data Quality Visible. International Journal of Digital Curation, 12, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.577

Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018). Preserving Workflow Reproducibility: The RePlay-DH Client as a Tool for Process Documentation. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, K. Hasida, H. Isahara, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, & T. Tokunaga (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (pp. 563–570). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).

Gärtner, M., Hahn, U., & Hermann, S. (2018). Preserving Workflow Reproducibility: The RePlay-DH Client as a Tool for Process Documentation. In N. C. (. chair), K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, K. Hasida, H. Isahara, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, & T. Tokunaga (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).

Bieliauskas, S., & Schreiber, A. (2017, April). DLR-SC/prov-comics: QS PROV Comics Prototype - Big fixes [Zenodo]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.555927

Group, D. M. W. (2017). DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Version 4.1. https://doi.org/10.5438/0015

Hellerstein, J. M., Sreekanti, V., Gonzalez, J. E., Dalton, J., Dey, A., Nag, S., Ramachandran, K., Arora, S., Bhattacharyya, A., Das, S., & others, . (2017). Ground: A Data Context Service. Cidr.

Jones, M. B., Boettiger, C., Mayes, A. C., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., Gil, Y. G., Fenner, M., Nowak, K., Hahnel, M., Coy, L., Allen, A., Crosas, M., Sands, A., Hong, N. C., Cruse, P., Katz, D., & Goble, C. (2017). CodeMeta: an exchange schema for software metadata. Version 2.0. https://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0

Schembera, B., & Bönisch, T. (2017). Challenges of Research Data Management for High Performance Computing. International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, 140–151. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-67008-9_12

Schreiber, A., & Struminski, R. (2017). Tracing personal data using comics. Universal Access in Human--Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches and Methods: 11th International Conference, UAHCI 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9--14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 11, 444–455.

Stein, A., Applegate, K. J., & Robbins, S. (2017). Achieving and Maintaining Metadata Quality: Toward a Sustainable Workflow for the IDEALS Institutional Repository. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55, Article 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1358786

Wilkinson, M. D., Sansone, S.-A., Schultes, E., Doorn, P., Bonino da Silva Santos, L. O., & Dumontier, M. (2017). A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/225490

Kohwalter, T., Oliveira, T., Freire, J., Clua, E., & Murta, L. (2016). Prov Viewer: A Graph-Based Visualization Tool for Interactive Exploration of Provenance Data. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 71–82). Springer International Publishing.

Neumaier, S., Umbrich, J., & Polleres, A. (2016). Automated Quality Assessment of Metadata across Open Data Portals. J. Data and Information Quality, 8, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2964909

Neumaier, S., Umbrich, J., & Polleres, A. (2016). Automated quality assessment of metadata across open data portals. Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), 8, Article 1.

Pimentel, J. F., Freire, J., Braganholo, V., & Murta, L. (2016). Tracking and Analyzing the Evolution of Provenance from Scripts. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 16–28). Springer International Publishing.

Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N., & Kozinsky, B. (2016). AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Computational Materials Science, 111, 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013

Schreiber, A. (2016). Standardisierung eines erweiterbaren Modells für Provenance-Daten (PROV-SPEC) (Nos. 2016–04). Article 2016–04.

Wu, K., Coviello, E. N., Flanagan, S. M., Greenwald, M., Lee, X., Romosan, A., Schissel, D. P., Shoshani, A., Stillerman, J., & Wright, J. (2016). MPO: A System to Document and Analyze Distributed Heterogeneous Workflows. In M. Mattoso & B. Glavic (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes (pp. 166–170). Springer International Publishing.

Belhajjame, K., Zhao, J., Garijo, D., Gable, M., Hettne, K., Palma, R., Mina, E., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, J. M., Bechofer, S., Klyne, G., & Goble, C. (2015). Using a suite of ontologies for preserving workflow-centric research objects. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 32, 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003

Belhajjame, K., Zhao, J., Garijo, D., Gamble, M., Hettne, K., Palma, R., Mina, E., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, J. M., Bechhofer, S., Klyne, G., & Goble, C. (2015). Using a suite of ontologies for preserving workflow-centric research objects. Journal of Web Semantics, 32, 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003

Cai, L., & Zhu, Y. (2015). The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, 14, Article 0. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002

Chao, T. (2015). Mapping Methods Metadata for Research Data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 10, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.347

Moreau, L., Groth, P., Cheney, J., Lebo, T., & Miles, S. (2015). The rationale of PROV. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 35, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.04.001

Rasaiah, B. A., Jones, S. D., Bellman, C., Malthus, T. J., & Hueni, A. (2015). Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality. Remote Sensing, 7, Article 4. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/remotesensing/remotesensing7.html#RasaiahJBMH15

Rasaiah, B. A., Bellman, C., Jones, S. D., Malthus, T. J., & Roelfsema, C. M. (2015). Towards an Interoperable Field Spectroscopy Metadata Standard with Extended Support for Marine Specific Applications. Remote Sensing, 7, Article 11. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/remotesensing/remotesensing7.html#RasaiahBJMR15

Starr, J., Castro, E., Crosas, M., Dumontier, M., Downs, R. R., Duerr, R., Haak, L. L., Haendel, M., Herman, I., Hodson, S., Hourclé, J., Kratz, J. E., Lin, J., Nielsen, L. H., Nurnberger, A., Proell, S., Rauber, A., Sacchi, S., Smith, A., et al. (2015). Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications. PeerJ Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1

Amorim, R., Aguiar Castro, J., Rocha, J., & Ribeiro, C. (2014). LabTablet: Semantic Metadata Collection on a Multi-domain Laboratory Notebook. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 478, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13674-5_19

Brauer, P., Czerniak, A., & Hasselbring, W. (2014). Start Smart and Finish Wise: The Kiel Marine Science Provenance-Aware Data Management Approach. In A. Chapman, B. Ludäscher, & A. Schreiber (Eds.), TAPP. USENIX Association. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/tapp/tapp2014.html#BrauerCH14

Farnel, S., & Shiri, A. (2014). Metadata for Research Data: Current Practices and Trends. In W. E. Moen & A. Rushing (Eds.), Dublin Core Conference (pp. 74–82). Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/dc/dc2014.html#FarnelS14

Grunzke, R., Hesser, J., Starek, J., Kepper, N., Gesing, S., Hardt, M., Hartmann, V., Kindermann, S., Potthoff, J., Hausmann, M., Müller-Pfefferkorn, R., & Jäkel, R. (2014). Device-Driven Metadata Management Solutions for Scientific Big Data Use Cases. 22nd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing, 317–321.

Grunzke, R., Breuers, S., Gesing, S., Herres-Pawlis, S., Kruse, M., Blunk, D., de la Garza, L., Packschies, L., Schäfer, P., Schärfe, C., Schlemmer, T., Steinke, T., Schuller, B., Müller-Pfefferkorn, R., Jäkel, R., Nagel, W. E., Atkinson, M., & Krüger, J. (2014). Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 26, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3116

Grunzke, R., Breuers, S., Gesing, S., Herres-Pawlis, S., Kruse, M., Blunk, D., de la Garza, L., Packschies, L., Schäfer, P., Schärfe, C., Schlemmer, T., Steinke, T., Schuller, B., Müller-Pfefferkorn, R., Jäkel, R., Nagel, W. E., Atkinson, M. P., & Krüger, J. (2014). Standards-based metadata management for molecular simulations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 26, Article 10. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/concurrency/concurrency26.html#GrunzkeBGHKBGPSSSSSMJNA014

Malik, T. (2014). Geobase: Indexing NetCDF Files for large-scale Data Analysis. In Big Data Management, Technologies, and Applications (pp. 295–313). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4699-5.ch012

Rousidis, D., Sicilia, M.-Á., Garoufallou, E., & Balatsoukas, P. (2014). Data Quality Issues and Content Analysis for Research Data Repositories : The Case of Dryad. In P. Polydoratou & M. Dobreva (Eds.), ELPUB (pp. 49–58). IOS Press. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/elpub/elpub2014.html#RousidisSGB14

Rousidis, D., Garoufallou, E., Balatsoukas, P., & Sicilia, M.-Á. (2014). Metadata for Big Data: A preliminary investigation of metadata quality issues in research data repositories. Inf. Services and Use, 34, Article 3–4. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/isu/isu34.html#RousidisGBS14

Tran, H. D., Holt, J., Goodrich, R. W., Mader, J. A., Swain, M., Laity, A. C., Kong, M., Gelino, C. R., & Berriman, G. B. (2014). Metadata and Data Management for the Keck Observatory Archive. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2054830

für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), B. (2016). Open Access in Deutschland. https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Open_Access_in_Deutschland.pdf